fix: improve channel step UX copy and resume prompt

[WcaleNieWolny]

Summary

• Replace vague channel step copy with a clear explanation: what a channel is, that nothing goes live until a native build with Capacitor Updater ships to the stores, and a link to channel docs
• Convert channel confirm ("Do you want a custom channel name instead of production?") into a select with emoji labels: ✅ Use "production" / ✏️ Choose a custom name
• Convert resume prompt ("Would you like to continue from where you left off?") into a select with emoji labels for consistency: ✅ Yes, continue / ❌ No, start over

Test plan

• Run node dist/index.js i — channel step should show the new explanation + select
• Cancel mid-onboarding, re-run — resume prompt should show emoji select instead of yes/no confirm

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Improvements

  • Switched resume confirmation to a two-choice selector for clearer flow
  • Changed channel selection to a two-choice selector between default and custom names
  • Adjusted channel input placeholder to show examples (e.g., staging, beta, dev)

• Documentation

  • Added/updated link and guidance for channel (release track) information

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 55e20c47-ca74-409f-b683-6b6dbd2eac47

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d40fa8a and 2e85e3b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/init/command.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Replaced yes/no confirmation prompts with 2-option selectors in the init command onboarding flow: resume steps confirmation and channel selection. Updated conditional checks to compare selector string values and revised user-facing channel guidance and placeholder text.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Init command prompts src/init/command.ts	Replaced pConfirm booleans with pSelect returning `'yes'

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• fix: improve init onboarding UX for app add step #562: Also replaces confirm prompts with select prompts in the init onboarding flow within src/init/command.ts.
• refactor: merge prerequisite check into step 1, reduce to 12 steps #561: Modifies readStepsDone and addChannelStep logic and messaging in the same file.
• fix: eliminate flash frame between step transitions #567: Updates prompts and messaging within addChannelStep in src/init/command.ts.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through prompts both crisp and new,

Chose “default” or “custom,” yes or no withdrew.
Channels now wear tracks of release,
The init path hums with tidier peace.
🥕✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately captures the main changes: improving UX copy for the channel step and updating the resume prompt mechanism from yes/no confirmations to select-based options.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/channel-step-ux-copy

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d40fa8a6d5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud