Skip to content

feat: 改进模板, 移除 2018fall, 修改模板放置历年代码方式#16

Merged
Certseeds merged 15 commits intomasterfrom
develop
Nov 9, 2025
Merged

feat: 改进模板, 移除 2018fall, 修改模板放置历年代码方式#16
Certseeds merged 15 commits intomasterfrom
develop

Conversation

@Certseeds
Copy link
Owner

Description

  1. 整改已有模板.
  2. 采用新方式储存历年代码

Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

之后历年代码将不会在存储在release/master分支上, 而是在 master分支某个tag衍生出的{year}fall {year}spring子分支上.

How Has This Been Tested?

Local test Pass

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

现在这几个都使用图数据结构取代了裸图

Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Certseeds <51754303+Certseeds@users.noreply.github.com>
@Certseeds Certseeds self-assigned this Nov 9, 2025
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 9, 2025 10:11
@Certseeds Certseeds added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 9, 2025
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request removes all 2018fall lab code and associated resources, implementing a new approach for storing historical semester code. Instead of maintaining these files in the release/master branches, historical code will now be stored in dedicated semester-specific branches (e.g., {year}fall, {year}spring) derived from tags on the master branch.

Key Changes:

  • Complete removal of the 2018fall directory structure
  • Elimination of all lab assignments (labs 4-8) including source code, tests, and resources
  • Removal of build configuration files (pom.xml) for the 2018fall semester
  • Deletion of documentation and submission statistics

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 299 out of 579 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
Multiple 2018fall/lab_*/ directories Removes entire 2018fall lab structure including all source files, test files, resources, READMEs, and Maven configurations
2018fall/pom.xml Removes the parent Maven configuration for the 2018fall semester
submit.csv files Removes submission statistics for labs 5, 6, and 7

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@Certseeds Certseeds merged commit a091766 into master Nov 9, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants