Improving benchmarks: more blockchains and metrics

[emiliana32]

Hello,
I recently discovered your interesting benchmarks. The overall e2e latency experienced by a user goes from the moment he sends a transaction to the moment it is finalised. For this reason, you should take into account both the block time and the time-to-finality (TTF). Therefore, in the worst case scenario, which is the most important to consider, the total finality time = block time + TTF. In the best case scenario, however, the finality time = TTF. Other websites like this one are also reporting the data incorrectly.

• Algorand: block time 3 s, TTF 0 s. Finality 3+0=3 s
• Aptos: block time 0.05 s, TTF 0 s. Finality 0.05+0=0.05 s
• Stellar: block time 6 s, TTF 0 s. Finality 6+0=6 s
• Solana: block time 0.4 s, TTF 12.8 s. Finality 0.4+12.8=13.2 s
• TON: block time 0.4 s, TTF 0.6 s. Finality 0.4+0.6=1 s
• Near: block time 0.6 s, TTF 0.6 s. Finality 0.6+0.6=1.2 s

Which blockchain is the fastest? Furthermore, you should include Aptos, Sui, Somnia, ICP, Sei, Cronos, Near and Kaia amongst the fastest blockchains.
I know this is a challenging task, but you should consider including this particular set of blockchains in the benchmarks: Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token and Highest staking yield.

Thank you for you work