fix(rpc): use large message lookback limit in API tests to mitigate offline test failure

src/tool/subcommands/api_cmd/api_compare_tests.rs

@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ use tracing::debug;
 
 const COLLECTION_SAMPLE_SIZE: usize = 5;
 const SAFE_EPOCH_DELAY_FOR_TESTING: i64 = 20; // `SAFE_HEIGHT_DISTANCE`(200) is too large for testing
+const MESSAGE_LOOKBACK_LIMIT: i64 = 2000;
 
 /// This address has been funded by the calibnet faucet and the private keys
 /// has been discarded. It should always have a non-zero balance.
@@ -1237,16 +1238,19 @@ fn state_tests_with_tipset<DB: Blockstore>(
                 validate_message_lookup(StateSearchMsg::request((
                     None.into(),
                     msg_cid,
-                    800,
+                    MESSAGE_LOOKBACK_LIMIT,
                     true,
                 ))?),
                 validate_message_lookup(StateSearchMsg::request((
                     None.into(),
                     msg_cid,
-                    800,
+                    MESSAGE_LOOKBACK_LIMIT,
                     false,
                 ))?),
-                validate_message_lookup(StateSearchMsgLimited::request((msg_cid, 800))?),
+                validate_message_lookup(StateSearchMsgLimited::request((
+                    msg_cid,
+                    MESSAGE_LOOKBACK_LIMIT,
+                ))?),
             ]);
         }
         for msg in sample_messages(bls_messages.iter(), secp_messages.iter()) {
@@ -2306,8 +2310,11 @@ fn eth_state_tests_with_tipset<DB: Blockstore>(
                         .policy_on_rejected(PolicyOnRejected::PassWithQuasiIdenticalError),
                 );
                 tests.push(
-                    RpcTest::identity(EthGetTransactionReceiptLimited::request((tx.hash, 800))?)
-                        .policy_on_rejected(PolicyOnRejected::PassWithQuasiIdenticalError),
+                    RpcTest::identity(EthGetTransactionReceiptLimited::request((
+                        tx.hash,
+                        MESSAGE_LOOKBACK_LIMIT,
+                    ))?)
+                    .policy_on_rejected(PolicyOnRejected::PassWithQuasiIdenticalError),
                 );
             }
         }