Skip to content

Conversation

@tobias-tengler
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 9, 2026 15:30
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the ChilliCream.Nitro.App package from a pre-release insider version (29.0.0-insider.74) to a stable release version (29.0.1).

  • Updates NitroVersion property from pre-release to stable version

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@tobias-tengler tobias-tengler changed the title Update ChilliCream.NItro.App to 29.0.1 Update ChilliCream.Nitro.App to 29.0.1 Jan 9, 2026
@tobias-tengler tobias-tengler merged commit ea67ca2 into main Jan 9, 2026
121 checks passed
@tobias-tengler tobias-tengler deleted the tte/nitro-29-update branch January 9, 2026 15:38
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (11e5664) to head (1836134).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@     Coverage Diff      @@
##   main   #9037   +/-   ##
============================
============================

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2026

🚀 Fusion Gateway Performance Results

Simple Composite Query

Constant Load (50 VUs)

Requests/sec Error Rate
5818.34 req/s 0.00%
📊 Response Time Metrics
Min Med Max Avg P90 P95
0.80ms 7.07ms 160.91ms 8.44ms 13.26ms 18.89ms

Ramping Load (0→50→500→50 VUs)

Requests/sec Error Rate
4616.96 req/s 0.00%
📊 Response Time Metrics
Min Med Max Avg P90 P95
0.77ms 37.37ms 269.08ms 48.12ms 107.92ms 124.66ms

Executed Query

fragment User on User {
  id
  username
  name
}

fragment Review on Review {
  id
  body
}

fragment Product on Product {
  inStock
  name
  price
  shippingEstimate
  upc
  weight
}

query TestQuery {
  topProducts(first: 5) {
    ...Product
    reviews {
      ...Review
      author {
        ...User
      }
    }
  }
}

Deep Recursion Query

Constant Load (50 VUs)

Requests/sec Error Rate
270.73 req/s 0.00%
📊 Response Time Metrics
Min Med Max Avg P90 P95
12.84ms 173.96ms 594.59ms 179.19ms 222.70ms 243.83ms

Ramping Load (0→50→500→50 VUs)

Requests/sec Error Rate
312.38 req/s 0.00%
📊 Response Time Metrics
Min Med Max Avg P90 P95
3.04ms 656.44ms 1716.56ms 676.66ms 1377.28ms 1512.95ms

Executed Query

fragment User on User {
  id
  username
  name
}

fragment Review on Review {
  id
  body
}

fragment Product on Product {
  inStock
  name
  price
  shippingEstimate
  upc
  weight
}

query TestQuery {
  users {
    ...User
    reviews {
      ...Review
      product {
        ...Product
        reviews {
          ...Review
          author {
            ...User
            reviews {
              ...Review
              product {
                ...Product
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
  topProducts(first: 5) {
    ...Product
    reviews {
      ...Review
      author {
        ...User
        reviews {
          ...Review
          product {
            ...Product
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Variable Batching Throughput

Constant Load (50 VUs)

Requests/sec Error Rate
23983.21 req/s 0.00%
📊 Response Time Metrics
Min Med Max Avg P90 P95
0.09ms 1.67ms 43.97ms 2.03ms 3.89ms 4.76ms

Ramping Load (0→50→500→50 VUs)

Requests/sec Error Rate
19031.95 req/s 0.00%
📊 Response Time Metrics
Min Med Max Avg P90 P95
0.09ms 8.95ms 120.32ms 11.10ms 23.16ms 27.78ms

Executed Query

query TestQuery_8f7a46ce_2(
  $__fusion_1_upc: ID!
  $__fusion_2_price: Long!
  $__fusion_2_weight: Long!
) {
  productByUpc(upc: $__fusion_1_upc) {
    inStock
    shippingEstimate(weight: $__fusion_2_weight, price: $__fusion_2_price)
  }
}

Variables (5 sets batched in single request)

[
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "1", "__fusion_2_price": 899, "__fusion_2_weight": 100 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "2", "__fusion_2_price": 1299, "__fusion_2_weight": 1000 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "3", "__fusion_2_price": 15, "__fusion_2_weight": 20 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "4", "__fusion_2_price": 499, "__fusion_2_weight": 100 },
  { "__fusion_1_upc": "5", "__fusion_2_price": 1299, "__fusion_2_weight": 1000 }
]

No baseline data available for comparison.


Run 20856820534 • Commit b0ca7e9 • Fri, 09 Jan 2026 15:48:37 GMT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants