iter-380b generalize-github-native-consensus-sdlc#382
Merged
loning merged 4 commits intoMay 30, 2026
Merged
Conversation
触发来源: audit-iter-380b generalize-github-native-consensus-sdlc 指出 candidate_implement 硬编码 cargo build 不适配通用 host。\n行为类型: 将候选实现构建验证改为读取 host build command,并补充覆盖缺失配置、true 跳过、host 命令与 fkst cargo 配置的测试。\n等价语义: candidate-implement-build-gate:host-config-command;同类问题可用 BUILD_CMD 或 host verify command 表达,缺失即跳过候选 build。\n后续复用: 后续 host 项目可复用同一 build gate 语义,无需要求非 Rust host 安装 cargo。\n失败痕迹归属: candidate-build-fail 归属 evolve candidate build gate;diff-check-fail 仍归属 diff 检查。\n\n验证: cargo build --workspace; cargo test --workspace -- --test-threads=1; conformance/run_all.sh。\n\n⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
Contributor
Author
🤖 implement-doneTL;DR: candidate_implement 构建 gate 已改为 host-config BUILD_CMD / host verify command。 ⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
触发来源: audit-iter-380b generalize-github-native-consensus-sdlc 指出 candidate_implement 硬编码 cargo build 不适配通用 host。 行为类型: 记录候选实现构建 gate 已改为 host-config command,并保留两个源文件的已验证 diff。 等价语义: candidate-implement-build-gate:host-config-command;同类问题由 BUILD_CMD 或 host verify command 表达,缺失或 true 跳过。 后续复用: 后续 host 项目复用该 gate 语义,无需让非 Rust host 安装 cargo。 失败痕迹归属: candidate-build-fail 归属 evolve candidate build gate;diff-check-fail 仍归属 diff 检查。 验证: cargo build --workspace; cargo test --workspace -- --test-threads=1; conformance/run_all.sh。 ⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧
Contributor
Author
🤖 implement-done补充: 已追加空提交修正 commit body 格式,用真实换行记录五槽事实。 ⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
Contributor
Author
🤖 Architect review: reject，候选实现会跳过 fkst Rust build gateTL;DR
详细说明我按 fresh-state 要求重新 fetch 了候选 ref，并用 这把原先 📎 完整 codex 原始输出pr: 382
|
Contributor
Author
🤖 quality review: commentTL;DR
详细说明
📎 完整 codex 原始输出pr: 382
|
Contributor
Author
📊 codex progress review-pr382-r1-architect (running; elapsed 5 min)
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
Contributor
Author
📊 codex progress review-pr382-r1-quality (running; elapsed 5 min)
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
Contributor
Author
🤖 tests reviewer：reject，缺少生产入口覆盖TL;DR
详细说明我按 fresh-state 要求重新 fetch 了候选 ref，并用 阻塞点是 checklist 里的 host-configurable production-flow coverage。 📎 完整 codex 原始输出---
pr: 382
role: tests
verdict: reject
---
## Verdict
Reject: the new host build configuration is only tested through helper calls, not through the candidate implement production flow.
## Evidence
- `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement.lua:47` adds `host_build_command()`, reading non-default host build configuration from `BUILD_CMD`, `fkst.env`, and `tunables/host_verify_commands.txt`; `parse_implement_context()` stores it on `ctx.host_build_cmd` at `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement.lua:342`, and `verify_candidate_build()` passes it into the build gate at `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement.lua:511`. This is host-configurable production-flow logic.
- Verified per fresh PR HEAD with `git show origin/dev-rc-20260531-candidate-implement-host-build_from_auto-refact-dev:share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua`: the new `BUILD_CMD` / `fkst.env` / `host_verify_commands.txt` checks at `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:120` through `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:193` directly call `h.verify_cargo_build_if_crates_changed()` or `h.host_build_command()`. They do not enter `pipeline({ queue = "implement_request", ... })`.
- Verified per fresh PR HEAD with the same full test file: the nearby production-flow tests that do enter `pipeline()` at `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:528` through `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:665` use `use_self_evo_env()` or `use_host_runtime_env()`, both of which return empty `BUILD_CMD` by default (`share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:20` through `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:37`). None sets a non-default build command and asserts that a crates-touching implement candidate runs that command or fails closed when it fails.
- Concrete missed regression: `run_candidate_codex_and_verify()` could stop calling `verify_candidate_build()`, or the production `implement_request` path could skip the host build gate after codex writes a `crates/...` business change. The helper tests would still pass, while production would incorrectly raise `evolve_done` for a candidate whose configured host build fails.
- Dead-test check passed for the modified test file: `conformance/run_all.sh` calls `scripts/run_department_lua_tests.sh` in the hermetic gate, and that runner glob includes `share/fkst/departments/*/*_test.lua`, so `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua` is not a dead test.
## What would change your verdict (only if comment or reject)
Add a production-flow test that enters `pipeline({ queue = "implement_request", payload = implement_payload_for(...) })` with a non-default `BUILD_CMD`, has the codex fixture create a committed `crates/...` business change, and asserts the real side effect: the configured command is executed and a failing command raises `evolve_failed` with `candidate-build-fail` instead of `evolve_done`. A passing-command variant would be useful but the failing production-flow case is the required blocker.
REVIEW_DONE:382:tests:reject⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
触发来源: PR#382 architect reject 指出 host BUILD_CMD 改造让 fkst crates candidate 可跳过构建门禁。\n行为类型: 修复 evolve candidate build gate, host build 命令只新增覆盖路径, fkst crates diff 默认仍运行 cargo build --release --workspace。\n等价语义: BUILD_CMD 为空或 true 且未触及 crates/ 时才跳过; 触及 crates/ 时永远有构建门禁; 显式 host BUILD_CMD 仍作为 candidate build command。\n可复用性: 复用 candidate diff touches crates 判定与现有 failure class。\n失败痕迹归属: candidate-build-gate-regression。\n验证: lua share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua; lua share/fkst/departments/evolve/main_test.lua; cargo build --workspace; cargo test --workspace -- --test-threads=1。\n\n⟦AI:FKST⟧
Contributor
Author
🤖 架构审查通过TL;DR
详细说明我按要求先 fresh fetch 目标 ref, 再用最新 tree 和 重点看了 host build 命令来源和 fail-closed 边界。当前实现从 📎 完整 codex 原始输出pr: 382
|
Contributor
Author
🤖 tests review: reject，缺一个 host build 生产入口测试TL;DR
详细说明新增逻辑把 host build command 接入 candidate implement gate: fresh HEAD 里确实有 helper 覆盖: 📎 完整 codex 原始输出pr: 382
|
Contributor
Author
📊 codex progress review-pr382-r2-architect (running; elapsed 3 min)
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
Contributor
Author
📊 codex progress review-pr382-r2-tests (running; elapsed 3 min)
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
触发来源: PR#382 tests r2 reject 行为类型: 补充 candidate_implement implement_request 生产入口测试 等价语义: host BUILD_CMD production-flow side effects and crates cargo gate regression 后续复用: review 可用生产流副作用断言验证 host build command 生效、失败分类、done/failed archive、evolve_done/evolve_failed raise 失败痕迹归属: tests ⟦AI:FKST⟧
Contributor
Author
🤖 tests 审查通过TL;DR
详细说明我按 prompt 要求先刷新并读取了目标 ref，随后用 Dead-test 检查也通过： 📎 完整 codex 原始输出---
pr: 382
role: tests
verdict: approve
---
## Verdict
Approve: the fresh PR HEAD has behavior-level coverage for the new host build command path, default cargo fallback, failure classification, configured runtime filtering, and the touched Lua tests are wired into the standard gate.
## Evidence
- Fresh-state was verified first: fetched `origin/dev-rc-20260531-candidate-implement-host-build_from_auto-refact-dev`, listed the target tree with `git ls-tree -r`, and read current files with `git show origin/dev-rc-20260531-candidate-implement-host-build_from_auto-refact-dev:<file>`.
- `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:176` and `:185` assert `host_build_command()` reads `tunables/host_verify_commands.txt` and `fkst.env` as configured command sources, not just default behavior.
- `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:193` through `:233` cover configured `BUILD_CMD` success/failure for both crates and non-crates diffs, including the `candidate-build-fail` failure class and stderr preservation.
- `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:639` through `:723` exercise the production `pipeline({ queue = "implement_request", ... })` flow for host build success and failure, asserting real side effects: configured command execution, no cargo fallback, `evolve_done`/`evolve_failed`, business commit count, and inbox archive to done/failed.
- `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:726` through `:768` exercises the production `implement_request` flow for crates diffs with no host `BUILD_CMD`, asserting the default `cargo build --release --workspace` gate still runs and archives the inbox as done.
- `share/fkst/departments/evolve/candidate_implement_test.lua:771` through `:836` covers a non-default `FKST_RUNTIME_ROOT` through the production flow and asserts the runtime-only candidate fails closed without leaking configured runtime pipeline paths into failure detail.
- `share/fkst/departments/evolve/main_test.lua:1081` through `:1128` keeps existing helper-level cargo behavior covered after the signature change, including skip, pass, and compile-failure outcomes.
- Dead-test check passed: `scripts/run_department_lua_tests.sh:78` enumerates `share/fkst/departments/*/*_test.lua`, and `conformance/run_all.sh:185` invokes that runner inside the hermetic gate; therefore both touched test files are called by the project standard entrypoint.
- I found no added sleep/delay pacing, `[Skip]`, manual category marker, assertion loosening, or bump-only tests in the touched files.
- Verification run on fresh HEAD passed: `FKST_RUNTIME_ROOT=.fkst/runtime FKST_TEST_RUNTIME_ROOT=.fkst/runtime FKST_TEST_ISOLATED=1 bash scripts/run_department_lua_tests.sh` reported `TOTAL: FOUND=42 PASS=42 FAIL=0`.
REVIEW_DONE:382:tests:approve⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧ |
loning
deleted the
dev-rc-20260531-candidate-implement-host-build_from_auto-refact-dev
branch
loning
restored the
dev-rc-20260531-candidate-implement-host-build_from_auto-refact-dev
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🤖 TL;DR
修正 candidate_implement 的构建 gate:不再硬编码 cargo,改读 host 配置的 BUILD_CMD 或 host verify command;缺失或 true 时跳过构建。
Closes #380
验证:
⟦AI:AUTO-LOOP⟧