Skip to content

Conversation

@akinross
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@akinross akinross requested a review from shrsr March 20, 2025 15:51
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 20, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.04082% with 264 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.72%. Comparing base (b00b58c) to head (42d6eae).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ernal/provider/resource_aci_application_profile.go 79.03% 198 Missing and 27 partials ⚠️
internal/provider/resource_aci_bridge_domain.go 82.67% 22 Missing ⚠️
...al/provider/data_source_aci_application_profile.go 94.27% 9 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
internal/provider/resource_aci_application_epg.go 80.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1320      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.81%   86.72%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         129      131       +2     
  Lines       74394    75661    +1267     
==========================================
+ Hits        64588    65619    +1031     
- Misses       7800     8007     +207     
- Partials     2006     2035      +29     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

shrsr
shrsr previously approved these changes Mar 20, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@shrsr shrsr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM


fvRsAEPgMonPol:
overwrites:
relation_to_application_epg_monitoring_policy: "relation_to_monitor_policy"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be "relation_to_monitoring_policy"?

shrsr
shrsr previously approved these changes Mar 25, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@shrsr shrsr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

shrsr
shrsr previously approved these changes Mar 25, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@shrsr shrsr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@shrsr shrsr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@sajagana sajagana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Collaborator

@gmicol gmicol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@lhercot lhercot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lhercot lhercot merged commit c5ac90b into CiscoDevNet:master Mar 29, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants