Conversation
|
Almost 12 minutes is required for 3.11-dev to build pandas, which is required for 2 tangential tests. This may motivate dropping 3.11-dev from the proposed suite of tests. |
I agree. It's highly unlikely that our customers are using the in-development version of python, and we can cross any relevant bridges when it is officially released. |
| - '3.10.0' | ||
| - '3.10.1' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why explicitly test both 3.10.0 and 3.10.1?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because there is no Travis option for just 3.10; only 3.10.0, 3.10.1 and 3.10-dev. I'm okay with dropping 3.10.0 but had it in there because conda doesn't have a 3.10.1 build yet so I wanted to be able to make sure that anything that went wrong was not because of a 3.10.0 v. 3.10.1 difference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To clarify, nothing went wrong with 3.10.1, correct?
| language: python | ||
| dist: bionic | ||
| python: | ||
| - '3.6' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One of our customers is currently using 3.6 to run their ingest pipeline. The customer team is following up to understand why that is, but so long as it is we need to support it.
2 participants
Python 3.10 is currently considered stable, so we should be testing against it. This augments the tests that Travis runs to do this, and propagates the need to support Python 3.10 to required packages.