Skip to content

Conversation

@Am-phi
Copy link
Contributor

@Am-phi Am-phi commented Feb 1, 2025

Summary

This is a response to #2127 which is complementary to #2022. I'm however concerned by my solution as it is, it may be contested or refused. The solution proposed here is by adding a specific check for each operation that gets the dataType to check if it's a simpleAggregateFunction, and if it's the case take the nested column datatype. Maybe a modification of the ClickhouseColumn implementation could be cleaner but its scope is above my understanding at this moment.

Closes #2127

Checklist

@chernser
Copy link
Contributor

chernser commented Feb 14, 2025

Good day, @Am-phi!
Would you please resolve the conflicts so I can merge it?
Thanks!

@Am-phi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Am-phi commented Feb 14, 2025

Good day @chernser ,
I'll take care of it during the weekend.

@chernser chernser merged commit 8b6226a into ClickHouse:main Mar 14, 2025
18 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Client-v2] The newBinaryFormatReader can't correctly read SimpleAggregate values

2 participants