Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeLagrange
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 3, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #143 will degrade performances by 33.36%

Comparing fix/ci-unknown-dep (38fd08a) with main (e5597da)1

Summary

⚡ 22 improvements
❌ 28 regressions
✅ 313 untouched
🆕 22 new

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
WallTime build_vec 226 ns 209 ns +8.13%
Simulation Iterative 161.7 ns 132.5 ns +22.01%
WallTime Recursive 52.5 µs 45.6 µs +15.24%
Simulation Iterative[20] 161.7 ns 132.5 ns +22.01%
Simulation Iterative[21] 163.3 ns 134.2 ns +21.74%
WallTime Recursive[20] 52.6 µs 45.6 µs +15.31%
WallTime Recursive[21] 85.2 µs 74.7 µs +13.98%
WallTime fibonacci_custom_measurement 370 ns 421 ns -12.11%
WallTime small_drop 46 ns 51 ns -9.8%
WallTime from_elem[16384] 973 ns 926 ns +5.08%
WallTime from_elem[2048] 238 ns 250 ns -4.8%
WallTime from_elem[8192] 549 ns 523 ns +4.97%
WallTime from_elem_decimal[2048] 251 ns 259 ns -3.09%
Simulation bench_array1[4] 154.4 ns 183.6 ns -15.89%
Simulation bench_array2[4] 154.4 ns 183.6 ns -15.89%
Simulation init_array[4] 154.4 ns 183.6 ns -15.89%
Simulation sleep_100ms 566.1 ns 595.3 ns -4.9%
Simulation sleep_100ms_with_custom_sample 566.1 ns 595.3 ns -4.9%
Simulation sleep_10ms 566.1 ns 595.3 ns -4.9%
Simulation sleep_1ms 566.1 ns 595.3 ns -4.9%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (1531eea) during the generation of this report, so e5597da was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@GuillaumeLagrange GuillaumeLagrange deleted the fix/ci-unknown-dep branch November 4, 2025 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants