Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
|
For images with meaningful tags (floating like So it's backwards from what you're picturing: the one container you care about is almost certainly already getting digest checks with zero labels. The labeling work you'd actually be signing up for is the opposite: And yeah, there's no global switch for that default anymore. If the containers you don't care about share images, you don't have to label each one individually. Worth being straight about the gap: there's genuinely no one-liner for "off everywhere except this one image." Closest is imgset grouping. If most of what you run is the same handful of images that's not bad, but if it's a pile of one-offs it is real per-container work. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
For my use case I am not realy interested in the digest updates of images. In de documentation I found the DD_WATCHER_{watcher_name}_WATCHDIGEST but this will be removed in v1.6. I only have one container on which I am interested in the digest for updates and if I understand it correctly I would need to add
dd.watch.digestto all my containers.All reactions