Skip to content

[Rule] GraphPartitioning to ILP #118

@zazabap

Description

@zazabap

Source: GraphPartitioning
Target: ILP
Motivation: Enables solving graph bisection via ILP solvers; standard formulation used in VLSI partitioning tools.
Reference: Brunetta, Conforti & Rinaldi, 1997

Reduction Algorithm

Notation:

  • Source: undirected graph $G = (V, E)$, $n = |V|$ (even), $m = |E|$
  • Target: ILP with binary variables, linear constraints, and a minimize objective

Variable mapping:

Partition variables: $x_i \in {0, 1}$ for each vertex $i \in V$ ($x_i = 1$ if $i \in B$).

Edge-crossing variables: $y_{uv} \in {0, 1}$ for each edge $(u, v) \in E$ ($y_{uv} = 1$ if the edge crosses the partition).

Constraints:

  1. Balance: $\sum_{i \in V} x_i = n/2$

  2. Crossing detection (for each edge $(u, v) \in E$):

    • $y_{uv} \geq x_u - x_v$
    • $y_{uv} \geq x_v - x_u$

Objective: minimize $\sum_{(u,v) \in E} y_{uv}$

Solution extraction: $A = {i : x_i = 0}$, $B = {i : x_i = 1}$.

Size Overhead

Target metric (code name) Polynomial (using symbols above)
num_vars $n + m$
num_constraints $2m + 1$

Validation Method

Closed-loop testing: solve GraphPartitioning by brute-force, solve the reduced ILP, and verify that both give the same optimal cut size.

Example

Source: 6 vertices, 9 edges: $(0,1), (0,2), (1,2), (1,3), (2,3), (2,4), (3,4), (3,5), (4,5)$.

ILP: 15 variables ($x_0, \ldots, x_5$ + 9 edge variables), 19 constraints (18 crossing + 1 balance).

Optimal: $x = (0,0,0,1,1,1)$, $A = {0,1,2}$, $B = {3,4,5}$, objective $= 3$ crossing edges.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions