-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
Fix/exposed api key #211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/exposed api key #211
Conversation
…ng process less error prone
|
Hi @yashpalzala, thanks. Skimmed through it and all looks good. Keep ensuring clean code and comments as you are already doing. Look forward to the next iteration. |
… replacing all the code that fetched ApiKey from config
|
covered case 1: commit: 60b0acf |
|
@yashpalzala we also made a directory shift recently to move everything in a Please take the latest pull at the earliest and we would be available to assist with any merge conflicts. thanks. |
|
Hi @samyakkkk Regarding the 3rd case, do you have any specific flow in mind? |
|
yes @yashpalzala, let's keep it simple. right by the clear chat button, let's add a profile button. Tapping on the profile button opens up profile edit page with a single option to update the API key. please focus majorly on the functionality, the UI could be fixed by us later. I'll also request to add tests if possible to ensure that all the three cases are working properly. Best. |
…into fix/exposed-api-key
…into fix/exposed-api-key
…nd changed fluttergpt commands from package.json to dashai commands
|
Hi @samyakkkk I see the branch is not yet merged. Can I help you out with something? |
|
Hi @yashpalzala, thanks for checking back. We are not able to ship this yet because we're yet to add the update api key functionality. apologies for the delay! we will prioritise it again soon. |
|
@samyakkkk looking forward to it, thanks @yashpalzala for working on it |
|
@yashpalzala I really thank you for your work on this PR! unfortunately we're moving away from the BYOK model and are not asking users their Gemini key anymore. I'm sorry we couldn't merge it for this reason. |
|
interesting. what model are you using now, how do you avoid excessive costs
or make back your costs please?
…On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:59 AM Samyak Jain ***@***.***> wrote:
@yashpalzala <https://github.com/yashpalzala> I really thank you for your
work on this PR! unfortunately we're moving away from the BYOK model and
are not asking users their Gemini key anymore.
I'm sorry we couldn't merge it for this reason.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#211 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXBGYMTSMXUCP2AV2S3FR3ZKPDQ7AVCNFSM6AAAAABDE6CJ46VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEMBVGYZDONZWHA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
We are using a revenue strategy to monetise SDK and API companies who will list on CommandDash. check plans we added today :D |
|
Sounds super fantastic! Thank you 🙂
....sent from my phone
…On Wed, Jul 3, 2024, 9:40 AM Samyak Jain ***@***.***> wrote:
We are using a revenue strategy to monetise SDK and API companies who will
list on CommandDash. check plans <https://www.commanddash.io/#pricing> we
added today :D
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#211 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXBGYLY35M2M4SRGGEM6U3ZKQEMNAVCNFSM6AAAAABDE6CJ46VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEMBWGM2DIMJVGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
PR related to issue: #207
currently covered case 2 :
For old users - we can release a patch wherein we can write a script to extract a user's secret-key that is stored in the
config and put it in secret storage and then delete it from the config.
@wadhia-yash Raising a PR for single case right now just to know if this changes are good enough and follows all rules as I didn't find much in contributions file.
Please let me know if any suggestions.