The geospatial ontology declares some object properties, including has_spatial_part_of. This property is the only one in the ro:has_part property hierarchy whose name ends with "_of". All the inverse properties in the ro:part_of hierarchy end with "_of". Would "has_spatial_part" be a better name for the property?
The geospatial ontology declares some object properties, including has_spatial_part_of. This property is the only one in the ro:has_part property hierarchy whose name ends with "_of". All the inverse properties in the ro:part_of hierarchy end with "_of". Would "has_spatial_part" be a better name for the property?