Revert back to Packit-based Testing Farm usage#14364
Merged
ggbecker merged 1 commit intoComplianceAsCode:masterfrom Feb 6, 2026
Merged
Revert back to Packit-based Testing Farm usage#14364ggbecker merged 1 commit intoComplianceAsCode:masterfrom
ggbecker merged 1 commit intoComplianceAsCode:masterfrom
Conversation
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
Collaborator
Author
|
Actually, I seemingly can't test this in my fork as I'm lacking the Packit-as-a-Service integration. |
openshift-ci
bot
removed
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
Real world use of Testing Farm via ATEX has shown some issues that might take time to debug and resolve. To reduce one's stress levels, let's revert back to what we had before to give us more time to fix the issues properly. Signed-off-by: Jiri Jaburek <comps@nomail.dom>
comps
force-pushed
the
revert_to_packit
branch
from
435a572 to
b6bf7c3
Compare
comps
requested review from
Mab879,
jan-cerny,
matusmarhefka and
vojtapolasek
as code owners
Member
|
/packit build |
ggbecker
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2026
Member
ggbecker
left a comment
ggbecker
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The packit tests for some reason are not being triggered here. I will merge this and open a new PR to check if tests are run, then adjust the right branch rules as the old criteria.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
Real world use of Testing Farm via ATEX has shown some issues that might take time to debug and resolve. This PR (hopefully) reverts to what we had before - using Packit to execute tests on Testing Farm.
I also added CentOS-Stream-10 to BSI.
I'm leaving behind
tests/run_tests_testingfarm.pyandtests/submit_results_to_testing_farm.pyto reduce the diff when we eventually re-introduce ATEX back (hopefully). If you'd like I can remove them in this PR too.Rationale:
To reduce one's stress levels, let's revert back to what we had before to give us more time to fix the issues properly.
Review Hints:
We probably won't be able to test this via PR CI given the workflow change, I'll start GH Actions in my fork.