feat: Local clipboard tool to copy text, image and filepaths#1453
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 3a73ef2 in 2 minutes and 43 seconds
More details
- Looked at
857lines of code in10files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
8drafted comments based on config settings.
1. python/composio/tools/local/clipboardtool/__init__.py:5
- Draft comment:
Missing newline at end of file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
2. python/composio/tools/local/clipboardtool/actions/image.py:59
- Draft comment:
Avoid using print statements for debugging; consider using a logging framework. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
3. python/examples/miscellaneous/clipboard_example.py:90
- Draft comment:
Hard-coded image path may break cross-platform compatibility. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
This is an example file demonstrating clipboard functionality. The hardcoded path is clearly just for demonstration purposes. The file is in an "examples" directory and contains multiple example usages. The path doesn't need to work everywhere since it's just sample code. The important part is demonstrating the API usage pattern.
The code could be more useful as an example if it used a more generic path that works everywhere. Someone copy-pasting this example would need to modify the path.
While the suggestion would make the code more portable, example code often uses simplified hardcoded values to focus on demonstrating the core functionality. The path is clearly marked as example code.
This comment should be deleted since it's nitpicking an example file where the specific path used isn't critical to demonstrating the clipboard functionality.
4. python/composio/tools/local/clipboardtool/actions/image.py:106
- Draft comment:
Ensure that 'request.save_path' includes a valid directory path; if it lacks one, os.path.dirname returns an empty string, which may cause os.makedirs to fail. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment raises a theoretical issue but os.makedirs() with exist_ok=True will handle empty strings gracefully - it will create in current directory. This is actually a reasonable fallback behavior. The comment is asking for validation without clear benefit. It's more of a "verify that..." style comment that doesn't point to a clear problem.
Perhaps there could be security implications of allowing arbitrary paths? Maybe the current directory fallback isn't desirable in all cases?
The code is already handling path creation safely with exist_ok=True. If path validation is needed, it should be done at a higher architectural level, not in this utility function.
Delete the comment as it's asking for verification without demonstrating a clear problem, and the current code handles the case safely.
5. python/tests/test_tools/test_local/test_clipboardtool.py:29
- Draft comment:
Using a module-scoped shared 'clipboard_state' fixture could lead to test interference; consider using a function-scoped fixture to ensure isolation between tests. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The clipboard_state fixture holds mutable state that is modified by each test through copy/paste operations. While the tests currently pass, they are dependent on running in a specific order and cleaning up after themselves. A function-scoped fixture would provide better isolation. However, looking at the test implementation, each test performs a complete copy-paste cycle and verifies the results, so the shared state doesn't actually cause problems.
The tests are working as designed - each test does a full copy-paste cycle and verifies its own results. The module-scoped fixture may actually be intentional to test persistence across operations.
While function-scoping would provide better isolation, the current implementation is valid and may be intentionally testing clipboard state persistence. The tests handle their own setup/verification.
The comment raises a valid testing best practice but the current implementation is working as intended and may be deliberately testing state persistence. The suggestion is not clearly necessary.
6. python/composio/tools/local/clipboardtool/__init__.py:5
- Draft comment:
Trailing whitespace found at the end of the import statement. Please remove the extra space after 'Clipboardtool' to ensure cleaner code. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
While trailing whitespace is generally undesirable, this is an extremely minor style issue that would typically be handled by automatic formatters or linters. It doesn't affect functionality and is not a significant code quality issue. Most IDEs automatically strip trailing whitespace on save.
Perhaps trailing whitespace could cause issues in some edge cases or with certain tools? Maybe it's part of a consistent style guide that needs to be followed?
Even if there are style guidelines about trailing whitespace, this is too minor to warrant a PR comment. This should be handled by automated tools, not manual review.
Delete this comment as it points out an extremely minor style issue that should be handled by automated tools rather than PR comments.
7. python/composio/tools/local/clipboardtool/__init__.py:5
- Draft comment:
The file is missing a newline at the end. Please add a newline at the end of the file to adhere to standard formatting best practices. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
8. python/setup.py:2
- Draft comment:
Typographical error: In the file header docstring (line 2), 'compsio core' appears to be a typo. Consider correcting it to 'composio core' to maintain consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_RUHPf0XYunnCH799
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
50a86b0 to
ab7cecc
Compare
| # Register actions in Action enum when the module is imported | ||
| register_clipboard_actions() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The register_clipboard_actions() function is now called at module import time, but it's also still being called when actions() is accessed. This could lead to duplicate action registration.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| # Register actions in Action enum when the module is imported | |
| register_clipboard_actions() | |
| # Register clipboard actions at module import time | |
| register_clipboard_actions() |
| # Create a test image instead of using a hard-coded path | ||
| test_image_path = os.path.join(temp_dir, "test_image.png") | ||
| # Create a simple test image | ||
| test_image = Image.new('RGB', (100, 100), color='red') | ||
| test_image.save(test_image_path) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code imports Image from PIL but the import statement is missing. Add from PIL import Image to fix the error.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| # Create a test image instead of using a hard-coded path | |
| test_image_path = os.path.join(temp_dir, "test_image.png") | |
| # Create a simple test image | |
| test_image = Image.new('RGB', (100, 100), color='red') | |
| test_image.save(test_image_path) | |
| from PIL import Image | |

Add Clipboardtool for in-memory clipboard management
A new
Clipboardtoolas requested in #455 , offering in-memory clipboard capabilities for text, images, and file paths. The tool is fully self-contained and maintains clipboard state in memory, making it useful for automated workflows and cross-platform compatibility.Features
Implementation details
Dependencies
This tool enhances automation capabilities by allowing agents to maintain their own clipboard state separate from the OS clipboard, making it especially useful for multi-step workflows that need to preserve data between operations.
Let me know about any changes or feedback.
Example ss:

Test ss:

Important
Introduces
Clipboardtoolfor in-memory clipboard management of text, images, and file paths, with full test coverage and example usage.Clipboardtoolfor in-memory clipboard management of text, images, and file paths.CopyText,PasteText,CopyImage,PasteImage,CopyFilePaths,PasteFilePathsinactionsdirectory.get_clipboard_state()function inbase_action.pyto manage clipboard state.clipboard_example.pydemonstrating usage.Pillow(>=10.2.0,<11) for image operations insetup.py.test_clipboardtool.pyfor all clipboard operations.This description was created by
for 3a73ef2. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.