- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 26
 
Vb/pdgone #911
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vb/pdgone #911
Conversation
          Codecov Report
 @@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           vb/src_ascopy     #911      +/-   ##
=================================================
+ Coverage          88.18%   88.37%   +0.18%     
=================================================
  Files                119      119              
  Lines              10118    10448     +330     
=================================================
+ Hits                8923     9233     +310     
- Misses              1195     1215      +20     
 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more  | 
    
| 
           A lot of the acrobatics happening in this branch have to do with the fact that: 
 Probably a good project for someone down the line would be to have a  I've submitted this as a separate PR so it can be merged after   | 
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @vineetbansal , tried running this against a known bad file (10028 shiny particles), and ASPIRE still seems to indicate it is bad, so I'm happy with that. I think this is probably ready for Joakim to also sign off on.
There were a few small things, but I think they are just questions and minor cosmetic followups we can do. Thanks!
| 
           Looks like the redundant PR merge conflicted themselves.  | 
    
| 
           Docs build failed because EMDB ftp was offline yesterday ( and so we could not download our datafile). Its online now, restarting jobs.  | 
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Much cleaner, although I confess there are some list comprehension acrobatics here that I have trouble following (in the  aspire.source.* modules). Perhaps some can be simplified (or commented) but this is not too urgent to hold up a merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Stripped off pandas from the rest of the codebase.