Conversation
- This is a non-standard header that Okta uses
WalkthroughThe changes involve expanding the rate limit header handling capabilities in the HTTP rate limiting package. Specifically, three new non-standard headers have been added to support Okta's API rate limit reporting: "X-Rate-Limit-Limit", "X-Rate-Limit-Remaining", and "X-Rate-Limit-Reset". These additions enhance the package's flexibility in extracting rate limit information from various API responses without modifying the core logic of the rate limit extraction mechanism. Changes
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/ratelimit/http.go (1)
16-30: Add test coverage for Okta rate limit headers.While the implementation looks good, consider adding test cases to verify the behavior with Okta's rate limit headers. This would help ensure compatibility and prevent regressions.
Would you like me to help generate test cases for the Okta rate limit headers?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pkg/ratelimit/http.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pkg/ratelimit/http.go (3)
16-16: LGTM! Addition of Okta rate limit header.The new header follows the existing pattern and is properly documented.
23-23: LGTM! Addition of Okta remaining requests header.The header follows the established pattern and maintains consistency with other non-standard implementations.
30-30: Verify Okta reset time format compatibility.While the header addition is correct, we should verify that Okta's reset time format is compatible with our
parseTimefunction.Let's check Okta's documentation for the reset time format:
✅ Verification successful
Time parsing implementation is compatible with Okta's format
The
parseTimefunction is designed to handle multiple time formats including Unix timestamps, RFC850, and RFC3339, with special handling for both relative and absolute timestamps. This implementation is sufficiently robust to handle Okta's X-Rate-Limit-Reset header format.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for documentation or tests related to Okta's X-Rate-Limit-Reset format # Expected results: Documentation or test cases showing Okta's reset time format # Search for any existing tests or documentation mentioning Okta rate limits rg -i "okta.*rate.*limit|rate.*limit.*okta" -g "*.{md,txt,go}" # Search for test cases specifically handling Okta's reset time format ast-grep --pattern 'func Test$_($_) { $$$ "X-Rate-Limit-Reset" $$$ }'Length of output: 410
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for parseTime implementation and related test cases ast-grep --pattern 'func parseTime($$$) { $$$ }' # Search for test cases related to time parsing ast-grep --pattern 'func Test$_(t *testing.T) { $$$ parseTime($$$) $$$ }' # Search for any time parsing related code rg "parseTime|time\.Parse" -A 5 -B 5 pkg/ratelimit/Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the complete implementation of http.go cat pkg/ratelimit/http.go # Search for rate limit related types and interfaces rg "type.*Rate" -A 5 pkg/ratelimit/Length of output: 4161
| @@ -13,18 +13,21 @@ var limitHeaders = []string{ | |||
| "X-Ratelimit-Limit", | |||
| "Ratelimit-Limit", | |||
| "X-RateLimit-Requests-Limit", // Linear uses a non-standard header | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
its weird to me we can't handle this via option parameters to uhttp or somehting. centralizing this is... well, gonna be hard, and future error prone.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We'll get 'em all eventually. Just one more http header and we'll have all of them covered. For sure this time. 😅
I agree that this setup is not ideal, but so far we only have two APIs that are wrong (Linear and Okta). If we have a 3rd one, then I think it's time to tweak this.
4 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit