Document organization required workflow rollout#76
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Documents the organization-level ruleset approach for rolling out a centrally-managed required Strix workflow from ContextualWisdomLab/.github, including current scope inventory, policy statements, and rollout evidence/risks.
Changes:
- Adds a decision record describing the active org ruleset that enforces the central Strix required workflow (without copying workflows into each repo).
- Captures a point-in-time inventory of targeted public, non-fork, non-archived repositories and their current workflow/protection posture.
- Records current policy, evidence gathered during rollout, recommended patterns, and follow-up risks.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues. FindingsNo blocking findings. SummaryInspected the PR changes and found no actionable blockers. Verification posture: Linter/static: Passed, TDD/regression: Not applicable, Coverage: Not applicable, Docstring coverage: Not applicable, DAG: Not applicable, PoC/execution: Not applicable, DDD/domain: Not applicable, CDD/context: Not applicable, Similar issues: Not applicable, Claim/concept check: Not applicable, Standards search: Not applicable, Compatibility/convention: Not applicable, Breaking-change/backcompat: Not applicable, Performance: Not applicable, Developer experience: Improved, User experience: Not applicable, Security/privacy: Not applicable. Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including docs/org-required-workflow-rollout.md.
Change Flow DAGflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs: org-required-workflow-rollout.md"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Inspected the PR changes and found no actionable blockers. Verification posture: Linter/static: Passed, TDD/regression: Not applicable, Coverage: Not applicable, Docstring coverage: Not applicable, DAG: Not applicable, PoC/execution: Not applicable, DDD/domain: Not applicable, CDD/context: Not applicable, Similar issues: Not applicable, Claim/concept check: Not applicable, Standards search: Not applicable, Compatibility/convention: Not applicable, Breaking-change/backcompat: Not applicable, Performance: Not applicable, Developer experience: Improved, User experience: Not applicable, Security/privacy: Not applicable.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including docs/org-required-workflow-rollout.md.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% test coverage.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence proves 100% docstring coverage.
DAG: Change Flow DAG maps docs/org-required-workflow-rollout.md through bounded evidence, review risk, and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, and current-head workflow evidence were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions and compatibility surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: changed files did not identify a user-facing UI surface; bounded evidence was reviewed for UX impact.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: No blockers found in the PR changes.
- Head SHA:
ec65bc8e4b3a88725893cb0d950ebd74cc683ad3 - Workflow run: 28220198494
- Workflow attempt: 1
Summary
Verification