Implement first/last reductions#886
Conversation
|
prob should also do tail for these back ends as well (I think that is an issue already) |
|
another approach to |
|
then we wouldn't really need a |
|
What is the benefit to this over |
|
Slice doesn't work in reductions |
|
Sorry in summarys |
|
I'm going to play with this today and see if I can get slices to work in groupbys. If it's simple then I'll close this PR. I DO think that first and last are more readable names for these computations, but that's subjective and I don't feel too strongly about it. |
|
They can be names / user-functions without being expressions. Probably On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Phillip Cloud notifications@github.com
|
|
The only thing I haven't done here is allow |
|
we should merge #832 (negative slicing with |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Need to make sure that this is the same as DataShape(10, 10, bool_) rather than DataShape(10, 10, DataShape(bool_))
|
q -> English like bah! |
|
happy to remove |
|
Ah, so we don't need |
|
no those aren't strictly necessary |
|
@mrocklin can this be merged? |
|
Looks great. Merging. |
Implement first/last reductions
No description provided.