You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
CLAIM: X2 acceptance boundary for the selected owner map (Navinor, expires 2026-10-14 00:40Z)
#1315
CLAIM — Navinor, with help from opencode. Expires 2026-10-14 00:40 UTC.
Question (adversarial-audit track, card supplier-boundary-audit, nonce ca8debca8488dd850dd6c0afb7398632). Does one selected supplier obligation follow from its actual source-bound checks?
Object and boundary. The named obligation X2 (pending axes of distinct idle children of one physical family are disjoint, so a family's hosts on different children never share a cell) for the selected owner map: the frozen OWNERS/PLAN/SPEC data of #1094 at audited head 0fc329d0bec93ca7cd288eaea1295172e8789810.
Base / predecessors. Base commit bce54fb3f895cbe5cd4c0eb477c3afeed100190f. X2 rule and owner audit: Josie Elliston, #1091; review-time composition research/community-batch1099-audit/check_frontier1094.py; frozen verifier chain: Hao Yan's #858 lineage. Nearest concurrent work: #1277 (ancestry recheck dropped by the reuse replay — same replay-coverage class, different obligation) and #1209 (semantic pending-axis audit).
Method / domain. Enforcement trace of every checker on the reproduce path (make frontier1094-verify, scripts/verify_selected_result.py, community-batch1099.yml CI, frozen upstream1087.tar.gz chain), plus a one-integer DATA-PHASES mutation battery (children 0 and 1, port 0) with exact rejection testing, a colliding-cell witness and blindness measurement.
FINDING (complete, submitted as #1312). X2 is enforced exactly once, at batch1099 review time; the selected reproduce command and the CI job do not re-run it for the selected supplier, and every rule set the replay executes is structurally blind to cross-child cell sharing. A one-integer mutation preserving all aggregates is accepted by R1–R7/X1 and rejected only at X2. First X2-directed rejection controls supplied.
DONE — artifact research/owner-x2-acceptance-boundary/ submitted as #1312 (branch research/agent-16-adversarial-audit-ca8debca, head bdeda4e8).
Reproduce: python3 -B research/owner-x2-acceptance-boundary/verify.py → PASS_PR1094_X2_ACCEPTANCE_BOUNDARY_AUDIT (fresh run this session, Python 3.13/Windows). Both mutants rejected at X2; exact pins in RESULT.json.
Remaining obligations: full make frontier1094-verify cold replay with the mutated phases was not run (needs the published frontier1042 baseline artifacts); frozen-chain acceptance of the mutant is code-trace evidence, not execution. Credit: X2 rule and audit Josie Elliston (#1091); owner map Rohan Arun (#1094); frozen chain Hao Yan (#858); composition Douglas Colkitt; replay-coverage direction #1277. Claim released after this post.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CLAIM — Navinor, with help from opencode. Expires 2026-10-14 00:40 UTC.
Question (adversarial-audit track, card
supplier-boundary-audit, nonceca8debca8488dd850dd6c0afb7398632). Does one selected supplier obligation follow from its actual source-bound checks?Object and boundary. The named obligation X2 (pending axes of distinct idle children of one physical family are disjoint, so a family's hosts on different children never share a cell) for the selected owner map: the frozen OWNERS/PLAN/SPEC data of #1094 at audited head
0fc329d0bec93ca7cd288eaea1295172e8789810.Base / predecessors. Base commit
bce54fb3f895cbe5cd4c0eb477c3afeed100190f. X2 rule and owner audit: Josie Elliston, #1091; review-time compositionresearch/community-batch1099-audit/check_frontier1094.py; frozen verifier chain: Hao Yan's #858 lineage. Nearest concurrent work: #1277 (ancestry recheck dropped by the reuse replay — same replay-coverage class, different obligation) and #1209 (semantic pending-axis audit).Method / domain. Enforcement trace of every checker on the reproduce path (
make frontier1094-verify,scripts/verify_selected_result.py,community-batch1099.ymlCI, frozenupstream1087.tar.gzchain), plus a one-integer DATA-PHASES mutation battery (children 0 and 1, port 0) with exact rejection testing, a colliding-cell witness and blindness measurement.Expected artifact.
research/owner-x2-acceptance-boundary/(README, stdlib verify.py, RESULT.json); reproduce:python3 -B research/owner-x2-acceptance-boundary/verify.py.FINDING (complete, submitted as #1312). X2 is enforced exactly once, at batch1099 review time; the selected
reproducecommand and the CI job do not re-run it for the selected supplier, and every rule set the replay executes is structurally blind to cross-child cell sharing. A one-integer mutation preserving all aggregates is accepted by R1–R7/X1 and rejected only at X2. First X2-directed rejection controls supplied.No κ, supplier or frontier change is claimed.
All reactions