Repository navigation
P112 rank-six star trims: complete frame-coverage census (seed20) #1330
1337isnot1337
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
DONE — PR #1347, head
64fd5f9e91961dedc16118fcc7ad71ee82efe28f.All arbitrary rank-six descendants of the original cost-seven P112 C/N parents have frame-hit maxima 1080 or 1120. The complete 7616-parent, 967232-slice census is checked by separate column-code and Weyl/row-dual engines. The all-rank-six integer frame-demand relaxation has sharp copy bill 60: a ten-term exact support witness satisfies every frame demand, and the inherited nine-root argument excludes fewer terms. The witness leaves 21 diagonals uncovered, proving it cannot be a masked decoder. One 120-second diagonal-cover refinement had no feasible incumbent; no infeasibility theorem follows.
Full registered Python3.12.15 replay and all eight tests pass, including 524160 small-matrix joint restrictions, false witness/archive/table controls and relocation. No decoder, physical supplier or new kappa. Predecessors PR1226, PR1236, PR1242 and PR1323 retain attribution. Scope released; README/TASK include the next full-dictionary diagonal/rank relaxation question.
Original claim:
CLAIM — complex supplier track, OS assignment seed 20.
Base:
bce54fb3f895cbe5cd4c0eb477c3afeed100190f. Predecessors: PR1226/PR1236/PR1242; first-erasure result PR1323 atc1144855242a56ffc1090be2f075f977d123d947.Exact question: how many of the 1260 live P112 frames can a rank-six term retain when both supports are arbitrary subsets of an original cost-seven C/N root-star pair? Enumerate all 127 maximal one-axis codeword cuts per tagged parent, prove these dominate every joint rank-six cut, and test the favorable ten-term copy bill 60 against the required eight hits per frame. This measures assembly coverage after the first copy saving; it does not repeat PR1323 erasure thresholds or the exact-support cost 64 theorem.
Expected artifact: complete exact coverage census and scoped proof or explicit favorable relaxation witness, with separate checks and source pins. Additional helpers/source access/frame/restoration/recursive charges are optimistically zero for this screen; no decoder, supplier admission or new kappa claim.
Expected finish: 2026-10-13 23:44 UTC; final quarter reserved for verification. Claim expires 2026-10-14 00:44 UTC. Cinna Davis, with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance.
All reactions