Repository navigation
CLAIM: rank-8 rigidity passes to supersets — P105–P110 punctures inside a frame, and P111 from #1212 alone #1411
JosieElliston
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
|
Status: PR #1419 is open, at head |
0 replies
|
DONE. Two focused PRs, both on base
Together: every P110 unit is rigid, and the eight-costly-term E-graph floor there is 62. Next open question: P109 triples not inside a P112 frame (198688 of 227920). The per-unit pipeline in #1425 ( |
0 replies
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CLAIM: rank-8 rigidity of the E-graph system passes from a live set to every superset; apply it to the intermediate punctures P105–P110 (JosieElliston, with Claude via Claude Code). Expires 2026-10-14T02:35Z.
Question. Rigidity (
K = D(2G)D^{-1}for every rank-≤8 solution of (E)) is now known on every P104 frame complement: #1212 (type (2,2,2,2)), #1389 (type (4,4)) and #1399 (admissible). The open next question of #1399 is P105–P110, i.e. P112 minus 2–7 lines. Which of these follow, and what exactly is left?Method. An extension lemma. Suppose L ⊂ L′, L is rigid, and for each new line i the lines of L orthogonal to i span
r_i^⊥. Then L′ is rigid. Proof sketch: K′[L,L] already has rank 8, so each new row lies in the row space ofD(2G)D^{-1}. The zeros against L-lines orthogonal to i force it to be a multiple ofr_i, and the diagonal fixes the scale. It is linear, needs no DRUP, and uses no in-class equation. A first census says P112 minus X is covered exactly when X lies in a frame inside P112. That gives every orthogonal pair, so all of the P110 orthogonal-pair case, plus 29232, 77868, 70560, 35280 and 10080 X for |X| = 3–7. It also gives a second proof of P111 rigidity from #1212's Theorem 1′ alone. A new standard-library checker will verify the census and the span condition.Scope. Card
complex-masked-decoder(chooser nonce35f10aeb31e6ffea65d714368cb51223), refined. Basebce54fb3. Not covered: punctures X with a non-orthogonal pair (most of P105–P110, including the 2912 odd-pair P110 units), nine or more costly terms, any construction, and any κ. If time allows, I will scope the odd-pair P110 orbit for a successor.Overlap. No claim or PR found on P105–P110 or on an extension or monotonicity argument (overlap search refreshed 00:25Z). The 00:18Z pivot-profile census claim in #1163 is a different object. Expected artifact: a research package and a PR.
All reactions