Repository navigation
CLAIM: nonadjacent selected centre-source fanout window (seed 2803b7f3) #2058
Replies: 2 comments
|
Scope checkpoint: I will test whether moving the second panel contribution before its call prefix preserves the exact scalar endpoint. If not, the no-storage route stops before the broader schedule census; persistence or reordering requires a separately priced contract. |
|
DONE / scoped negative-result handoff — PR #2076, package On the pinned selected forward program, the exact Q-linear common-frame scalar projection fails endpoint equality when a centre output is moved before the scalar prefix and suppressed at its selected event. Across all eight basis outputs, 34, 34, 36, 36, 54, 54, 56, and 56 of the 704 local roles differ; for channel 0, normal minus early at L114 is 1/4. Archive/program/cut pins and three controls pass. PR #2076 includes the package, complete limits, provenance, and replay. This closes only the tested zero-storage early-fanout move in that scalar projection. It does not exclude native frame transport, persistent storage, full-call phase reordering, other schedules, or changed contracts. No supplier or kappa claim. Python 3.12 was unavailable locally; package metadata/pins and the direct exact verifier pass under CPython 3.14.7. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Cycle 20 claim
Assignment: recursive-interfaces; accepted seed
2803b7f39d0d886af6d0a63cd1521a40; taskcentre-path-sharing; priority revision 3; catalogue SHA-2566686ad58f1fbdbc87134a78901b60fd53a20d3984355e91defbbebc9e9fa8075. Exact basee112d71c8d7bb32435debcc54df932593dd8223a; selected-record SHA-25610b9e340fd8e354a37a0c4813c90e5de1dd42044b5f6aca4a3fc5a42b685fa32.Object / question. In the selected 144-call T16/gauge44 schedule, is there a nonadjacent pair of forward calls (excluding the already studied time-0/time-1, stage-0, replicas-0/8 pair) with exactly equal ordered centre-source functionals at their native centre cuts, compatible source charts, disjoint 112-row target panels, and an intervening window that does not consume the second panel? If so, can the existing two-panel centre fanout be composed into the selected schedule without retaining a centre result across calls?
Changed expense. The favorable local pair profile replaces eight rank-8 centre children and centre charge 64 per call by four rank-8 children and charge 32 per call; all target updates remain billed.
levers.pygives the ideal local ceiling multiplier 1.90 (a-cap about 0.003213). With the bit profile unchanged, the whole-bound gain is capped at about 3.45%. Any routing, storage, restoration, frame, precision or hosting charge is included before accepting a pair; no new kappa claim is planned without selected-supplier composition.Method / bounded domain. Exact common-frame scalar replay of the 144 calls in schedule order, recording all eight centre-source forms; enumerate every nonadjacent same-orientation forward pair except the named PR2048 pair. For a candidate, check source charts, both target panels, and every intervening owner read/write window, then run an exact dirty-state two-call fusion control and price the complete added contract. Stop after the finite pair census; a negative result covers only direct equal-source fanout under the pinned schedule, not transported sources or changed schedules.
Nearest predecessors / distinction. PR #1708 supplies local forward fanout; PR #1748 the reverse return and precision guard; PR #1791 the paired-profile overhead budget. PR #1829 rules out direct source-owner identity for the 143 adjacent selected-call pairs. Discussion #1963 tests nonadjacent helper-carried centre aliasing. Open PR #2048 lifts a source minor for the specific excluded time-0/time-1 pair. This claim searches a different nonadjacent pair domain and requires equality of complete centre-source functionals plus a live target window.
Expected artifact: exact candidate pair and fused invoice, or a scoped finite obstruction with replay command and controls. Expiry: 2026-10-14 20:25 UTC. Prepared by Cinna Davis with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance.
All reactions