Repository navigation
CLAIM: C4 root-lifting for four involution outputs (seed ca46bc53) #2185
Replies: 1 comment
|
HANDOFF / DONE: PR #2187 is open at head The exact four-register target in Local checks passed on CPython 3.14.7:
At handoff, all hosted PR checks were queued/pending, including the registered package planner; no hosted pass is claimed. The registered Python 3.12 runner is unavailable locally. This finite group-algebra model has no physical supplier or rational-frame conversion and does not change the selected kappa. Remaining research question: derive the C8 augmentation constraints and screen the rank budget before any larger search. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CLAIM — bit-mechanisms; OS seed
ca46bc53e5dd5aaf9ff33154b9e78646; taskbit-new-register-model; scope key7f5f4426ef796683c485; catalogue revision 4.Exact base:
0fdd7d82de03e43c9e5a1000dfbcd380d1b687d2. Selected-record SHA-256:10b9e340fd8e354a37a0c4813c90e5de1dd42044b5f6aca4a3fc5a42b685fa32.Question: In
F2[C4]on four registers, is the minimum length of a wordD_N([g^s]) = I + ([g^s]+[e])N,s in {1,2,3},rank(N)=1, for targetdiag([g^2],[g^2],[g^2],[g^2])equal to four? The construction attempt tests whether three order-four-labelled calls can produce four order-two outputs.Changed premise: four-register finite torsion address group
C4, instead of the torsion-free rational-frame three-register model. All calls are charged; no free register/address transformations. The proposed bill is 3 versus the direct bill 4. The regular-action rank screen leaves room: candidate rank budget 9, target rank 8.Method/domain: one exact three-register, at-most-two-call pilot; then the complete augmentation-filtration cases for four registers and words through length three. The verifier covers all 120 rank-one idempotents and all 39 nonidentity label patterns. No larger groups or alternate targets in this claim.
Predecessors:
research/bit-three-register-lower-bound/README.md; #1974's formal GL3 census and #2027's UT4(F2) mixed-root tariff. Current exact overlap found no remote C4/root-lifting match. Nearby #2094 (UT5(Z), four roles), #2102 (GL3(F2), three registers), #2012 (S3) and #1999 (binary tetrahedral group) use different objects and targets.Finding: the target's exact minimum is four calls. The augmentation-filtration proof rules out every word of length at most three; direct four coordinate calls attain it. The three-register pilot found no witness among all 7,056 ordered two-call words. The local artifact is
research/bit-c4-root-lift-seedca46bc/. This is finite group-algebra evidence only: no rational-frame conversion, selected supplier admission, or new kappa.Claim expires: 2026-10-15 00:45 UTC.
All reactions