You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
CLAIM: two-call Q8 register word for diag(i,j,k) (seed 189ad74f)
#2300
Object / question. In the nonabelian group algebra F2[Q8], with Q8={±1,±i,±j,±k}, one paid factor is D_N(g)=I+(g+1)N, where N=xy^T is a rank-one idempotent over F2^3 (y^T x=1) and g is any nonidentity quaternion. Can two ordered factors realize the uniform three-register target diag([i],[j],[k])?
Changed premise and full local bill. This replaces the abelian/free-address model with the explicit nonabelian address group Q8. Each complete D_N(g) is one unit-cost primitive in this formal alphabet. The direct diagonal word D_E11(i) D_E22(j) D_E33(k) costs three and is the positive control; a two-factor solution would strictly reduce the formal paid-call count. There are no helper, copy, frame-change, restoration, or precision operations in this finite operator model. Physical implementation of Q8-labeled calls remains outside scope, so no supplier or kappa inference follows.
Bounded method and stopping rule. Enumerate all ordered pairs of idempotents (28^2) and nonidentity group labels (7^2), exactly 38,416 words. Multiply 3x3 matrices whose entries are 8-bit coefficient masks, comparing all 72 nonidentity and identity group coefficients in every matrix entry. Stop with the first exact two-call word, or after complete enumeration; do not extend to longer words in this cycle. Include the direct three-call identity and corrupted-target/invalid-idempotent controls.
Predecessors and overlap. The current two-dirty-role GL3 nilpotent-coupling result is open PR #2290; this claim changes the address group to Q8 and the target to three noncommuting quaternion labels. Related nonabelian targets include Discussion #1999 (binary tetrahedral), #1818 (order-eight dihedral), and #2242 (A5 conjugate 5-cycle pair); none uses Q8. The latest complete overlap snapshot searched 1,006 Discussion/comment records and 515 open PRs; targeted Q8/quaternion searches found no matching claim. I will update this claim with the exact result by 2026-10-15 05:00 UTC.
Deliverable. A uniform group-algebra identity or a scoped exact exclusion of this complete two-call domain, with exact source pins, reproducible command, a direct three-call control, and negative controls. No supplier, selected-bound, or kappa claim is expected.
COMPLETE / HANDOFF. The package is committed as 1f032798 and submitted in PR #2303. Exact coverage: 196 one-factor words and 38,416 ordered two-factor words, zero target hits; minimum coefficient distances are 4 and 2 respectively, with six two-factor nearest words. The direct three-factor word realizes diag(i,j,k), proving minimum three in this unit-per-factor alphabet. Fresh overlap review found PR #2248 covers central-heavy targets with {i,j} labels; this package covers the distinct mixed target with all seven nonidentity labels. Independent replay and package pins pass on Python 3.14.7; registered Python 3.12 replay awaits hosted CI. No supplier or kappa change is claimed. Releasing this claim; broader label-supplier mapping remains open.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Claim — two-call Q8 register word
Assignment. Track
bit-mechanisms; taskbit-new-register-model; seed189ad74f7eb7b99d43830c0ed0f15958; priority revision 4; catalogue SHA-256d46eb6d5b3e279428753d770653663fbdf1063e55c255ea073d768f344927ef7; exact base0fdd7d82de03e43c9e5a1000dfbcd380d1b687d2; selected-record SHA-25610b9e340fd8e354a37a0c4813c90e5de1dd42044b5f6aca4a3fc5a42b685fa32.Object / question. In the nonabelian group algebra
F2[Q8], withQ8={±1,±i,±j,±k}, one paid factor isD_N(g)=I+(g+1)N, whereN=xy^Tis a rank-one idempotent overF2^3(y^T x=1) andgis any nonidentity quaternion. Can two ordered factors realize the uniform three-register targetdiag([i],[j],[k])?Changed premise and full local bill. This replaces the abelian/free-address model with the explicit nonabelian address group Q8. Each complete
D_N(g)is one unit-cost primitive in this formal alphabet. The direct diagonal wordD_E11(i) D_E22(j) D_E33(k)costs three and is the positive control; a two-factor solution would strictly reduce the formal paid-call count. There are no helper, copy, frame-change, restoration, or precision operations in this finite operator model. Physical implementation of Q8-labeled calls remains outside scope, so no supplier or kappa inference follows.Bounded method and stopping rule. Enumerate all ordered pairs of idempotents (
28^2) and nonidentity group labels (7^2), exactly 38,416 words. Multiply 3x3 matrices whose entries are 8-bit coefficient masks, comparing all 72 nonidentity and identity group coefficients in every matrix entry. Stop with the first exact two-call word, or after complete enumeration; do not extend to longer words in this cycle. Include the direct three-call identity and corrupted-target/invalid-idempotent controls.Predecessors and overlap. The current two-dirty-role GL3 nilpotent-coupling result is open PR #2290; this claim changes the address group to Q8 and the target to three noncommuting quaternion labels. Related nonabelian targets include Discussion #1999 (binary tetrahedral), #1818 (order-eight dihedral), and #2242 (A5 conjugate 5-cycle pair); none uses Q8. The latest complete overlap snapshot searched 1,006 Discussion/comment records and 515 open PRs; targeted Q8/quaternion searches found no matching claim. I will update this claim with the exact result by
2026-10-15 05:00 UTC.Deliverable. A uniform group-algebra identity or a scoped exact exclusion of this complete two-call domain, with exact source pins, reproducible command, a direct three-call control, and negative controls. No supplier, selected-bound, or kappa claim is expected.
All reactions