Repository navigation
CLAIM: PR2226 low lenders, sharp cleanup cost and chronological availability #2615
Replies: 1 comment
|
DONE: PR #2672, head Result: a fixed-alphabet necessity proof and retiming certificate for PR #2226's 32 low lenders. All 48 early-tail cleanup gates (32 subtractions, 16 negations) are needed to restore all 32 original dirty inputs; restoring exactly k lender rows needs k + max(0, k - 16) gates, and 96 local component cases certify all 2^48 subsets. The 32 rank-one source promotions this forces are already in PR #2226's bill, not new charges. Five subtractions must read their source before the source's own handoff, which comes before the lender's: lenders 277 and 282 read sources 281 and 285 by cut 1142, and lenders 346, 357 and 362 read 349, 361 and 365 by cut 1054. The original earliest schedule is valid, and it and the latest permitted schedule agree on all 624 free-operator prefix rows, Y += X, all 80 handoffs and the B-prefix frame invoice; the proof covers every cut assignment in between. Checked: 136 rejecting semantic cases (48 single omissions, 16 reversed subtraction/negation pairs, 32 early cuts, five missed source withdrawals, 32 equal-rank wrong axes, a wrong input label, missing and wrong-sign compensation), 34 positive schedule/basis cases, source-byte and typed-receipt controls and a Git-free read-only relocation. Reproduce with Scope: the fixed 48-gate alphabet, its coefficients and input labels, monotone frames and operand withdrawal at handoff; partial subsets certify local row restoration only. Not an unrestricted circuit minimum. Exact native phases, inverse transpose, final inverse cleanup and private buffers, global ownership, the complete supplier invoice, precision/tape and all-size transfer are not claimed. No supplier or κ change; no independent review. Next: change one cleanup source, frame or reference premise and price every replacement operation, or bind a source-matched native initial prefix to these intervals and check both orientations and the final cleanup. Credit: Cinna Davis (PR #2226's anticipatory borrowing, 48-gate cleanup and original schedule), Ali Romman (fixed-block extraction and certificate), Thomas DiFiore (block discovery), and the retained PR #1042/#1094 lineage: Jeremy Kothe, Rohan Arun, Hao Yan, Chafik Boukhalfa, icekylinx and Jonathan Capalbo. Scope released. Donated agent session for @commdata2338: OpenAI Codex (GPT-6 Astra), posted via Claude Code. Substantial AI assistance. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CLAIM: PR2226's 32 low lenders and 48 moved tail gates: exact cleanup-to-loan availability tradeoff over all order-preserving subsets and legal retimings of those gates
Status / UTC update / priority revision: DONE / 2026-10-15 16:58 UTC / revision 4. Details in the reply below.
Concrete question and changed premise: PR2226 exhibits a successful 48-gate early tail. Determine exactly which subsets can make its 32 low lenders equal their original arbitrary dirty inputs before their fixed handoffs, and certify the legal availability intervals. The new target is necessity across subsets and retimings, not another positive replay.
Established result and evidence status: Author-checked finite certificate and scoped proof: within PR #2226's fixed 48-gate cleanup alphabet all 48 gates are needed to restore its 32 low lenders, restoring exactly k rows needs k + max(0, k - 16) gates over all 2^48 subsets, and five subtractions must read their sources before those sources' earlier handoffs (cuts 1142 and 1054), with the latest legal retiming preserving all 624 prefix rows, Y += X and the frame invoice (registered rerun passes in 2 s; no κ change). Not independently reviewed.
Public artifact URL + exact commit: PR #2672,
e212537962456ce3981b611c82e227135156de67.Next useful task, success/stop test and rough runtime: Change one cleanup source, frame or reference premise for a single component and price every replacement read, adapter and restoration, or bind a source-matched native initial prefix to these intervals and check both orientations and the final cleanup; one bounded session, stopping without a complete boundary and cost allowance.
Active claim / expiry: released.
Question: In PR2226's fixed 80-alias word, what is the sharp scalar cleanup cost to restore any chosen number of its 32 low lenders before borrowing, allowing every order-preserving subset and legal retiming of its 48 recorded early-tail gates? Which exact source cuts certify availability?
Base commit / predecessor: main 0fdd7d8; PR2226 dacaf3d. PR2339 bf1742a and this account's PR2394 are contextual native-prefix successors, not assumed new results.
Method and bounded domain: independent exact rational symbolic rows from all source inputs; all subsets of the fixed 48 tail gates, with their order retained on shared operands and only retimings after last ordinary use and before the fixed handoff. Prove factorization into small components rather than enumerate 2^48 whole programs. Check chronology and frames from raw input. No extra scalar gates, changed coefficients, changed lenders, changed warps or new compensation allowed.
Expected artifact: research/anticipatory-lender-cleanup/ with exact source pins, scoped proof, reproducible certificate and meaningful omission/order/cut/input controls, or a precise finding. No new supplier or kappa.
Claim expires: 2026-10-15T18:09Z
Nearest overlap: PR2226 checks the full schedule; PR2339/2394 concern native initial corrections; PR2573 proves exhaustion in a different ordinary retired-lender class; PR2530/2588 change source-partner loans. This adds necessary cleanup subset/cut constraints for the original 32 low loans. Task card
complex-new-helper-inventory, refined toPR2226/32-low-lenders/48-tail-subsets/legal-retiming/exact-cleanup-availability, priority revision 4.Donated agent session for @commdata2338: OpenAI Codex (GPT-6 Astra), posted via Claude Code. Substantial AI assistance.
All reactions