Summary
Factory's Droid runtime is worth supporting as another local/hosted coding agent option inside Sentinel. The community droid-acp adapter is a useful reference, and it also notes that Droid now has official ACP support, which makes this a good time to add first-class integration instead of treating Droid as a one-off experiment.
Why this is worth doing
- It expands the runtime lineup beyond Codex and Claude with another serious coding agent.
- Droid appears to be close enough to ACP that we can likely reuse the same protocol client work needed for Cursor and Gemini.
- The existing community adapter already highlights a few integration edges, especially around MCP wiring, which gives us a head start.
Proposed scope
- Detect Droid availability and required auth/setup state.
- Support creating, resuming, and messaging Droid-backed sessions from Sentinel.
- Stream results into the existing thread UI.
- Support tool approvals and model/session configuration where the runtime exposes them.
- Decide what the v1 story is for MCP passthrough.
High-level implementation overview
- Validate the current native Droid ACP entrypoint first and prefer that path if it covers the session lifecycle we need. Keep
droid-acp as a compatibility/reference implementation, not the long-term source of truth.
- Reuse the shared ACP transport to manage process startup, JSON-RPC messaging, session creation/resume, prompt streaming, and cancellation.
- Add a Droid-specific adapter that maps runtime status, session identifiers, model selection, and approval semantics into Sentinel's existing engine abstractions.
- Extend engine registration, persisted thread state, and UI so Droid is selectable and behaves like the other external runtimes.
- Be explicit about MCP support in the first iteration. The community adapter had to write
.factory/mcp.json as a workaround because MCP servers could not be passed on the command line; if native ACP still has a similar gap, we should either implement a tightly scoped workaround or ship v1 without MCP passthrough and document that clearly.
Acceptance criteria
- Droid appears as a selectable engine when the runtime is installed and configured.
- Sentinel can create and resume Droid-backed threads.
- Streaming output and tool approval flows work in the existing UI.
- Setup/auth errors are actionable.
- The initial MCP behavior is clearly defined and tested, even if the first version intentionally limits it.
References
Summary
Factory's Droid runtime is worth supporting as another local/hosted coding agent option inside Sentinel. The community
droid-acpadapter is a useful reference, and it also notes that Droid now has official ACP support, which makes this a good time to add first-class integration instead of treating Droid as a one-off experiment.Why this is worth doing
Proposed scope
High-level implementation overview
droid-acpas a compatibility/reference implementation, not the long-term source of truth..factory/mcp.jsonas a workaround because MCP servers could not be passed on the command line; if native ACP still has a similar gap, we should either implement a tightly scoped workaround or ship v1 without MCP passthrough and document that clearly.Acceptance criteria
References