Skip to content

Conversation

@madpah
Copy link
Collaborator

@madpah madpah commented Nov 13, 2024

This PR primarily drafts changes to resolve #64.

Additional clarifications have been made in relation to other work under discussion:

madpah and others added 5 commits November 6, 2024 16:06
Update to consistently refer to the final portion of the TEI as `unique-identifier`.

Signed-off-by: Paul Horton <paul.horton@owasp.org>
…e-identifier` is required to be unique only within the `domain-name` scope

Signed-off-by: Paul Horton <phorton@sonatype.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Horton <phorton@sonatype.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Horton <phorton@sonatype.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Horton <phorton@sonatype.com>
@madpah madpah changed the title updated Discover to cater for move to SVCB DNS records Updated Discovery to cater for move to SVCB DNS records Nov 13, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@oej oej left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

````
**Note**: this requires a registration of the TEI URN schema with IANA.
**Note**: this requires a registration of the TEI URN schema with IANA - [see here](https://github.com/CycloneDX/transparency-exchange-api/issues/18)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't like putting issue references in the text. It's easy to forget to remove those.

@oej oej merged commit 1c1c949 into CycloneDX:main Nov 18, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Which DNS Record Type to use in Discovery? URI Record Type is not widely supported

2 participants