Additional DVB-I (A177) classification schemes from all published versions#11
Additional DVB-I (A177) classification schemes from all published versions#11c-alpha merged 8 commits intoDVBProject:masterfrom paulhiggs:master
Conversation
…ce of video content
Add the A77 version in which the colorimetry classification scheme was created.
|
Ping? |
|
Can you merge? |
|
Did you have a look to the review comments? |
I don't see any for this PR. |
Odd; for me they appear just below the list of your seven commits near the top of the conversation tab of this PR's web page. I made two comments on individual lines in |
I don't see any comments |
| <!-- /wp:paragraph --> | ||
|
|
||
| <!-- wp:table {"className":"table table-sm"} --> | ||
| <figure class="wp-block-table table table-sm"><table><thead><tr><th>URI</th><th>DVB Standard(s)</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="/metadata/cs/2019/DVBHowRelatedCS-2019.xml">urn:dvb:metadata:cs:HowRelatedCS:2019</a></td><td>A177</td><td>Initial version</td></tr><tr><td><a href="/metadata/cs/2020/DVBHowRelatedCS-2020.xml">urn:dvb:metadata:cs:HowRelatedCS:2020</a></td><td>A177r1</td><td>Added content finished banner</td></tr><tr><td><a href="/metadata/cs/2021/DVBHowRelatedCS-2021.xml">urn:dvb:metadata:cs:HowRelatedCS:2021</a></td><td>A177r2</td><td>(same as 2020 version)</td></tr></tbody></table></figure> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Instead of "(same as 2020 version)" we could perhaps say something more descriptive as for instance "Bump namespace version"?
| <!-- /wp:paragraph --> | ||
|
|
||
| <!-- wp:table {"className":"table table-sm"} --> | ||
| <figure class="wp-block-table table table-sm"><table><thead><tr><th>URI</th><th>DVB Standard(s)</th><th>Description</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="/metadata/cs/2019/DVBContentSubjectCS-2019.xml">urn:dvb:metadata:cs:ContentSubject:2019</a></td><td>A177</td><td>Initial version</td></tr></tbody></table></figure> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are there any ETSI released versions of TS 103 770 that correspond to previous A177 revisions? If yes, shouldn't we list ETSI versions where available?
|
I figured it; have to explicitly "submit review". |
2 participants
No description provided.