Skip to content

Conversation

@OnionFastener
Copy link
Contributor

addressing #179

@OnionFastener OnionFastener marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2025 20:05
@ShaneMander ShaneMander self-requested a review March 12, 2025 04:17
Copy link
Collaborator

@ShaneMander ShaneMander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice that we are reviewing our http responses. Overall, I think a few of the catch blocks can be simplified to not having the if (e.entity == EntityType....). Additionally, in some areas we seem to be adding catch-blocks for exceptions that aren't being thrown (although, it's possible I missed where exactly some are being thrown)

@Daggerpov Daggerpov marked this pull request as draft March 20, 2025 03:15
@Daggerpov Daggerpov marked this pull request as ready for review March 28, 2025 10:58
@Daggerpov Daggerpov changed the base branch from main to staging March 30, 2025 06:50
ShaneMander
ShaneMander previously approved these changes Mar 31, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@ShaneMander ShaneMander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice

@OnionFastener OnionFastener dismissed ShaneMander’s stale review March 31, 2025 01:59

The merge-base changed after approval.

Daggerpov
Daggerpov previously approved these changes Mar 31, 2025
@Daggerpov
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for starting this off, @OnionFastener !

@Daggerpov Daggerpov merged commit 34a6341 into staging Mar 31, 2025
4 checks passed
@Daggerpov Daggerpov deleted the empty-list-exception-mega-branch branch March 31, 2025 05:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants