Fix split experiment#357
Merged
Merged
Conversation
cristian-tamblay
requested changes
Oct 29, 2025
Member
cristian-tamblay
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Small changes to allow 0 split at val/test
that the train split must be greater than zero
ba98adc to
13faca7
Compare
cristian-tamblay
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request improves the dataset splitting workflow in both the backend and frontend, with a focus on better error handling, validation, and user feedback for dataset splits in experiments. The main changes are the introduction of more precise validation and clearer error messages for both random and manual splits, as well as a minor backend fix to dataset index handling.
Frontend validation and user experience improvements:
Backend fix: