chore: transfer dataplane feature ownership to agent-data-plane team

[jszwedko]

Summary

• Transfer /internal/controller/datadogagent/feature/dataplane CODEOWNERS from @DataDog/agent-metric-pipelines to the new @DataDog/agent-data-plane team.
• The dogstatsd feature entry (/internal/controller/datadogagent/feature/dogstatsd) remains owned by @DataDog/agent-metric-pipelines.
• Register [teams."Agent Data Plane"] in .ddqa/config.toml (jira project DADP, label team/agent-data-plane).

Test plan

• CODEOWNERS syntax check passes
• TOML syntax is valid
• GitHub recognizes @DataDog/agent-data-plane as a reviewer for dataplane changes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 95031deecc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Create the new team label before routing dataplane PRs

For any PR that changes /internal/controller/datadogagent/feature/dataplane after this lands, .github/workflows/pr-codeowners-labeler.yml:156-174 derives team/agent-data-plane from this CODEOWNERS entry and fails the workflow if that label is absent. I checked the repository's current public label list and team/agent-data-plane is not present, while the previous team/agent-metric-pipelines label is, so dataplane PRs will start failing the labeler until the new label exists or this owner maps to an existing label.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[jszwedko]

Added the missing label.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 40.69%. Comparing base (0dcbf67) to head (95031de).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2929   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.69%   40.69%           
=======================================
  Files         321      321           
  Lines       28413    28413           
=======================================
  Hits        11563    11563           
  Misses      16015    16015           
  Partials      835      835           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	40.69% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0dcbf67...95031de. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[datadog-official]

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 40.81% (+0.00%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 95031de | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}