chore(ci_visibility): use envier

[gnufede]

Checklist

• PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
• The PR description includes an overview of the change
• The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
• The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
• The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
• Newly-added code is easy to change
• The change follows the library release note guidelines
• The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
• Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

• Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
• Title is accurate
• All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
• Avoids breaking API changes
• Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
• Newly-added code is easy to change
• Release note makes sense to a user of the library
• If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
• Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

ddtrace/internal/ci_visibility/settings.py                              @DataDog/ci-app-libraries
ddtrace/contrib/internal/selenium/patch.py                              @DataDog/apm-core-python @DataDog/apm-idm-python
ddtrace/contrib/internal/unittest/patch.py                              @DataDog/ci-app-libraries
ddtrace/ext/test_visibility/__init__.py                                 @DataDog/ci-app-libraries
ddtrace/internal/ci_visibility/recorder.py                              @DataDog/ci-app-libraries
ddtrace/internal/ci_visibility/writer.py                                @DataDog/ci-app-libraries
tests/ci_visibility/api_client/test_ci_visibility_api_client.py         @DataDog/ci-app-libraries
tests/ci_visibility/test_ci_visibility.py                               @DataDog/ci-app-libraries
tests/ci_visibility/util.py                                             @DataDog/ci-app-libraries
tests/contrib/pytest/test_pytest.py                                     @DataDog/ci-app-libraries
tests/contrib/pytest/test_pytest_atr.py                                 @DataDog/ci-app-libraries

[github-actions]

Bootstrap import analysis

Comparison of import times between this PR and main.

Summary

The average import time in this PR is: 238 ± 3 ms.

The average import time in main is: 246 ± 5 ms.

The import time difference between this PR and main is: -7.4 ± 0.2 ms.

Import time breakdown

The following import paths have shrunk:

ddtrace.auto 3.408 ms (1.43%)

ddtrace.bootstrap.sitecustomize 2.024 ms (0.85%)

ddtrace.bootstrap.preload 1.937 ms (0.81%)

ddtrace.internal.products 1.724 ms (0.72%)

ddtrace.internal.remoteconfig.client 0.762 ms (0.32%)

ddtrace.internal.symbol_db.remoteconfig 0.185 ms (0.08%)

multiprocessing 0.164 ms (0.07%)

multiprocessing.context 0.164 ms (0.07%)

multiprocessing.reduction 0.164 ms (0.07%)

pickle 0.164 ms (0.07%)

_compat_pickle 0.164 ms (0.07%)

multiprocessing.sharedctypes 0.021 ms (0.01%)

multiprocessing.heap 0.021 ms (0.01%)

ddtrace.settings.profiling 0.212 ms (0.09%)

ddtrace.vendor.psutil 0.212 ms (0.09%)

ddtrace.vendor.psutil._pslinux 0.212 ms (0.09%)

ddtrace._trace.trace_handlers 0.048 ms (0.02%)

ddtrace._trace.utils_botocore.span_tags 0.048 ms (0.02%)

ddtrace._trace.utils_botocore.aws_payload_tagging 0.048 ms (0.02%)

ddtrace.vendor.jsonpath_ng 0.048 ms (0.02%)

ddtrace.vendor.jsonpath_ng.parser 0.048 ms (0.02%)

ddtrace.vendor.ply.yacc 0.048 ms (0.02%)

shlex 0.021 ms (0.01%)

ddtrace.appsec._common_module_patches 0.018 ms (0.01%)

ddtrace 1.383 ms (0.58%)

ddtrace._logger 0.433 ms (0.18%)

ddtrace.settings._core 0.318 ms (0.13%)

ddtrace.settings 0.318 ms (0.13%)

ddtrace.settings._config 0.318 ms (0.13%)

ddtrace.settings._telemetry 0.190 ms (0.08%)

ddtrace.internal.telemetry 0.190 ms (0.08%)

ddtrace.internal.telemetry.writer 0.190 ms (0.08%)

ddtrace.internal.utils.version 0.104 ms (0.04%)

ddtrace.vendor.packaging.version 0.104 ms (0.04%)

ddtrace.internal.telemetry.data 0.086 ms (0.04%)

ddtrace.internal.packages 0.053 ms (0.02%)

_sysconfigdata__linux_x86_64-linux-gnu 0.053 ms (0.02%)

sysconfig 0.033 ms (0.01%)

ddtrace.internal.gitmetadata 0.128 ms (0.05%)

ddtrace.ext.ci 0.128 ms (0.05%)

platform 0.128 ms (0.05%)

logging 0.116 ms (0.05%)

traceback 0.116 ms (0.05%)

contextlib 0.116 ms (0.05%)

ddtrace.trace 0.079 ms (0.03%)

ddtrace._trace.filters 0.031 ms (0.01%)

ddtrace._trace.processor 0.031 ms (0.01%)

ddtrace._trace.sampler 0.031 ms (0.01%)

ddtrace._trace.span 0.031 ms (0.01%)

ddtrace.internal._rand 0.031 ms (0.01%)

ddtrace._monkey 0.024 ms (0.01%)

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-03-21 17:33:56

Comparing candidate commit 8cb05a5 in PR branch gnufede/ci-vis-envier with baseline commit 00c254b in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 236 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically closed after a period of inactivity.
After this much time, it will likely be easier to open a new pull request with the
same changes than to update this one from the base branch. Please comment or reopen
if you think this pull request was closed in error.