enhancement(io): reduce binary size by reducing monomorphization around HTTP client/server types#1217
Conversation
Binary Size Analysis (Agent Data Plane)Target: ae08e63 (baseline) vs cbcff87 (comparison) diff
|
| Module | File Size | Symbols |
|---|---|---|
hyper_util |
-71.66 KiB | 105 |
core |
-51.43 KiB | 8158 |
saluki_common::task::instrument |
+32.34 KiB | 74 |
memory_accounting::allocator::Tracked |
-31.64 KiB | 2 |
tokio_rustls |
-23.71 KiB | 28 |
futures_util |
-19.66 KiB | 70 |
hyper |
-18.19 KiB | 335 |
[sections] |
-15.18 KiB | 7 |
hyper_http_proxy |
-12.76 KiB | 26 |
tower |
-11.83 KiB | 218 |
saluki_components::forwarders::datadog |
-11.28 KiB | 22 |
agent_data_plane::internal::remote_agent |
-10.82 KiB | 62 |
saluki_io::net::client |
+8.30 KiB | 38 |
h2 |
-8.11 KiB | 326 |
http |
+7.78 KiB | 303 |
tokio |
-7.40 KiB | 2137 |
anyhow |
+5.44 KiB | 1222 |
tracing_core |
+4.49 KiB | 403 |
regex_automata |
+4.19 KiB | 12 |
hashbrown |
-4.11 KiB | 274 |
Detailed Symbol Changes
FILE SIZE VM SIZE
-------------- --------------
[NEW] +1.79Mi [NEW] +1.79Mi std::thread::local::LocalKey<T>::with::h6c9a8fa0b613775b
[NEW] +113Ki [NEW] +113Ki agent_data_plane::cli::run::create_topology::_{{closure}}::h2ba97c4b54b0c30b
[NEW] +84.5Ki [NEW] +84.4Ki agent_data_plane::internal::control_plane::spawn_control_plane::_{{closure}}::h23810f4dc340e6f1
[NEW] +64.2Ki [NEW] +64.0Ki saluki_components::common::datadog::io::run_endpoint_io_loop::_{{closure}}::h08fc84c201eab0a3
[NEW] +57.9Ki [NEW] +57.7Ki agent_data_plane::cli::run::handle_run_command::_{{closure}}::h517a19a4b350019e
[NEW] +49.0Ki [NEW] +48.9Ki saluki_app::bootstrap::AppBootstrapper::bootstrap::_{{closure}}::h7b5b0f2785656dcb
[NEW] +46.4Ki [NEW] +46.3Ki h2::proto::connection::Connection<T,P,B>::poll::h722d9ba49acb2559
[NEW] +46.1Ki [NEW] +45.9Ki _<saluki_components::forwarders::otlp::OtlpForwarder as saluki_core::components::forwarders::Forwarder>::run::_{{closure}}::h16dd847b7336eb06
[NEW] +45.8Ki [NEW] +45.6Ki _<saluki_components::destinations::prometheus::Prometheus as saluki_core::components::destinations::Destination>::run::_{{closure}}::h35604ad415f05c97
[NEW] +44.4Ki [NEW] +44.2Ki _<saluki_components::transforms::aggregate::Aggregate as saluki_core::components::transforms::Transform>::run::_{{closure}}::ha4a67ee5b1751c11
[NEW] +44.1Ki [NEW] +44.0Ki saluki_env::workload::providers::remote_agent::RemoteAgentWorkloadProvider::from_configuration::_{{closure}}::h86e543c374450f5e
[DEL] -44.4Ki [DEL] -44.2Ki _<saluki_components::transforms::aggregate::Aggregate as saluki_core::components::transforms::Transform>::run::_{{closure}}::ha29366b6eeca130c
[DEL] -45.8Ki [DEL] -45.6Ki _<saluki_components::destinations::prometheus::Prometheus as saluki_core::components::destinations::Destination>::run::_{{closure}}::h5af8497790b0e5a6
[DEL] -46.1Ki [DEL] -45.9Ki _<saluki_components::forwarders::otlp::OtlpForwarder as saluki_core::components::forwarders::Forwarder>::run::_{{closure}}::h199692a5443d8e80
[DEL] -48.9Ki [DEL] -48.8Ki saluki_app::bootstrap::AppBootstrapper::bootstrap::_{{closure}}::h4ed2fbccacefa396
[DEL] -57.8Ki [DEL] -57.7Ki agent_data_plane::cli::run::handle_run_command::_{{closure}}::hd0c53bb9a80fae8f
[DEL] -64.1Ki [DEL] -63.9Ki saluki_components::common::datadog::io::run_endpoint_io_loop::_{{closure}}::he8167230eb298c36
[DEL] -84.5Ki [DEL] -84.4Ki agent_data_plane::internal::control_plane::spawn_control_plane::_{{closure}}::h9b41ecabd666bd22
[DEL] -113Ki [DEL] -113Ki agent_data_plane::cli::run::create_topology::_{{closure}}::h49037e00ff6b5d71
-2.6% -327Ki -2.6% -269Ki [20514 Others]
[DEL] -1.79Mi [DEL] -1.79Mi std::thread::local::LocalKey<T>::with::hbd3018a0c658f44a
-0.8% -237Ki -0.7% -178Ki TOTAL
Regression Detector (Agent Data Plane)Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: fd442497-54ab-4f72-9d48-918fdb30688a Baseline: 0cad7b4 ❌ Experiments with retried target crashesThis is a critical error. One or more replicates failed with a non-zero exit code. These replicates may have been retried. See Replicate Execution Details for more information.
Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_memory | memory utilization | +7.62 | [+7.04, +8.20] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_throughput | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.12, +0.14] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_cpu | % cpu utilization | -1.69 | [-6.99, +3.61] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts_cpu | % cpu utilization | +8.31 | [-48.39, +65.02] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ❌ | otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_memory | memory utilization | +7.62 | [+7.04, +8.20] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts_throughput | ingress throughput | +2.44 | [+2.31, +2.58] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics_5mb_cpu | % cpu utilization | +1.40 | [-4.69, +7.49] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.55 | [-0.84, +1.93] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.24 | [-1.91, +2.38] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics_5mb_throughput | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.10, +0.17] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts_throughput | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.13, +0.19] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_throughput | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.12, +0.14] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | quality_gates_rss_dsd_ultraheavy | memory utilization | +0.00 | [-0.13, +0.14] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_throughput | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.05, +0.05] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts_throughput | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.05, +0.05] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_throughput | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.03, +0.02] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_throughput | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.06, +0.05] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | quality_gates_rss_dsd_heavy | memory utilization | -0.14 | [-0.26, -0.01] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics_5mb_memory | memory utilization | -0.46 | [-0.70, -0.22] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts_memory | memory utilization | -0.55 | [-0.75, -0.35] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | quality_gates_rss_dsd_low | memory utilization | -0.59 | [-0.75, -0.44] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_512kb_3k_contexts_memory | memory utilization | -0.66 | [-0.84, -0.48] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_500mb_3k_contexts_memory | memory utilization | -0.66 | [-0.84, -0.49] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | quality_gates_rss_dsd_medium | memory utilization | -0.67 | [-0.87, -0.48] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_memory | memory utilization | -0.69 | [-0.89, -0.50] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_memory | memory utilization | -0.84 | [-1.09, -0.58] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_memory | memory utilization | -1.00 | [-1.18, -0.82] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | quality_gates_rss_idle | memory utilization | -1.42 | [-1.45, -1.39] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_100mb_3k_contexts_cpu | % cpu utilization | -1.42 | [-7.03, +4.18] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs_5mb_cpu | % cpu utilization | -1.69 | [-6.99, +3.61] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_1mb_3k_contexts_cpu | % cpu utilization | -3.70 | [-54.36, +46.96] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ➖ | dsd_uds_10mb_3k_contexts_cpu | % cpu utilization | -5.70 | [-34.08, +22.69] | 1 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | quality_gates_rss_dsd_heavy | memory_usage | 10/10 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ✅ | quality_gates_rss_dsd_low | memory_usage | 10/10 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ✅ | quality_gates_rss_dsd_medium | memory_usage | 10/10 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ✅ | quality_gates_rss_dsd_ultraheavy | memory_usage | 10/10 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
| ✅ | quality_gates_rss_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | (metrics) (profiles) (logs) |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Replicate Execution Details
We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.
Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.
| Experiment | Variant | Replicates | Failure | Logs | Debug Dashboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| experiment_with_failures | baseline | 0 (x8) 1 (x6) | Oom killed | Debug Dashboard |
The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.
❌ Retried Normal Replicate Execution Failures (non-profiling)
| Experiment | Variant | Replicates | Failure | Debug Dashboard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_memory | comparison | 7 | Failed to shutdown when requested | Debug Dashboard |
| otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_throughput | baseline | 2 | Failed to shutdown when requested | Debug Dashboard |
| otlp_ingest_traces_5mb_throughput | comparison | 2 | Failed to shutdown when requested | Debug Dashboard |
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
…d HTTP client/server types
33d24d9 to
cbcff87
Compare

Summary
This PR reduces some of the monomorphization around our various usages of
HttpClient.This is mostly in the form of switching to
axum'sBoxBodyinstead of separate concrete types, just to reduce the generated code. We've only done it in non-performance-critical areas so the boxing shouldn't really matter at all.Change Type
How did you test this PR?
Existing tests.
References
AGTMETRICS-400