-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
Add support for Deebot N8+ #626
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughA new file named Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/7bryc5.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/7bryc5.py
1-1: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
(B018)
1-1: Undefined name x5d34r
(F821)
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| x5d34r.py | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Critical: Invalid implementation and incorrect file structure
The file 7bryc5.py is invalid and needs to be properly implemented. Based on the codebase analysis:
-
The file contains invalid content (just a text string "x5d34r.py")
-
The implementation should follow the structure shown in
x5d34r.py:- Proper docstring describing the robot model
- Required imports from deebot_client
- Device registration using
DEVICES[short_name(__name__)]with appropriate capabilities
-
The file should be renamed to follow the project's naming convention for N8+ model, as other models use descriptive docstrings with random IDs as filenames
Please:
- Remove the invalid file
- Create a new implementation following the structure of
x5d34r.py - Define appropriate capabilities for the N8+ model
🔗 Analysis chain
Critical: Invalid implementation for Deebot N8+ support
There are several issues with this submission:
- The file contains invalid Python code (just a text string "x5d34r.py")
- The file name
7bryc5.pyappears to be a random string rather than a descriptive name - There's no actual implementation for the Deebot N8+ support as mentioned in the PR objective
Let me check the repository for existing robot implementations to help guide the proper structure:
Would you like me to:
- Provide a template for proper N8+ robot implementation based on existing robot implementations in the codebase?
- Open a GitHub issue with detailed requirements and implementation guidelines?
The previous output showed several robot implementations but we need to:
- Confirm the exact content of the problematic file
- Check for any N8 related files that might have been missed
- Understand the naming convention and structure of robot implementation files
This will help us provide more specific guidance for the proper implementation.
The previous output confirms that:
- The file
7bryc5.pyonly contains "x5d34r.py" which is invalid - All files in the directory use random-looking names
- There might be a mapping system in init.py that connects model names to these files
Let's check the proper implementation structure and the mapping system to provide accurate guidance.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find existing robot implementation files
fd -e py . deebot_client/hardware/deebot/ --exec head -n 20 {}
# Look for any N8 related code or documentation
rg -i "n8" --type py
Length of output: 15587
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the file content and structure more thoroughly
cat deebot_client/hardware/deebot/7bryc5.py
# Let's also check for any existing N8 related files that might have been missed
fd -t f -e py . --exec grep -l "N8" {}
# Let's look at the structure of a typical robot implementation
fd -t f -e py . deebot_client/hardware/deebot/ --exec ls -l {}
Length of output: 1230
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine one of the properly implemented robot files to understand the expected structure
cat deebot_client/hardware/deebot/x5d34r.py
# Also check if there's any mapping between model names and these files
cat deebot_client/hardware/deebot/__init__.py
Length of output: 8078
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
1-1: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
(B018)
1-1: Undefined name x5d34r
(F821)
|
I obviously did not understand the assignment. |
Good Evening!
Please merge this file to add support for the Deebot N8+.
Thank you.
Summary by CodeRabbit
x5d34r.pyfile in the Deebot hardware module.