Skip to content
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions deebot_client/hardware/deebot/7bryc5.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
x5d34r.py
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Invalid implementation and incorrect file structure

The file 7bryc5.py is invalid and needs to be properly implemented. Based on the codebase analysis:

  1. The file contains invalid content (just a text string "x5d34r.py")

  2. The implementation should follow the structure shown in x5d34r.py:

    • Proper docstring describing the robot model
    • Required imports from deebot_client
    • Device registration using DEVICES[short_name(__name__)] with appropriate capabilities
  3. The file should be renamed to follow the project's naming convention for N8+ model, as other models use descriptive docstrings with random IDs as filenames

Please:

  1. Remove the invalid file
  2. Create a new implementation following the structure of x5d34r.py
  3. Define appropriate capabilities for the N8+ model
🔗 Analysis chain

Critical: Invalid implementation for Deebot N8+ support

There are several issues with this submission:

  1. The file contains invalid Python code (just a text string "x5d34r.py")
  2. The file name 7bryc5.py appears to be a random string rather than a descriptive name
  3. There's no actual implementation for the Deebot N8+ support as mentioned in the PR objective

Let me check the repository for existing robot implementations to help guide the proper structure:

Would you like me to:

  1. Provide a template for proper N8+ robot implementation based on existing robot implementations in the codebase?
  2. Open a GitHub issue with detailed requirements and implementation guidelines?

The previous output showed several robot implementations but we need to:

  1. Confirm the exact content of the problematic file
  2. Check for any N8 related files that might have been missed
  3. Understand the naming convention and structure of robot implementation files

This will help us provide more specific guidance for the proper implementation.


The previous output confirms that:

  1. The file 7bryc5.py only contains "x5d34r.py" which is invalid
  2. All files in the directory use random-looking names
  3. There might be a mapping system in init.py that connects model names to these files

Let's check the proper implementation structure and the mapping system to provide accurate guidance.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find existing robot implementation files
fd -e py . deebot_client/hardware/deebot/ --exec head -n 20 {} 

# Look for any N8 related code or documentation
rg -i "n8" --type py

Length of output: 15587


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the file content and structure more thoroughly
cat deebot_client/hardware/deebot/7bryc5.py

# Let's also check for any existing N8 related files that might have been missed
fd -t f -e py . --exec grep -l "N8" {}

# Let's look at the structure of a typical robot implementation
fd -t f -e py . deebot_client/hardware/deebot/ --exec ls -l {}

Length of output: 1230


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine one of the properly implemented robot files to understand the expected structure
cat deebot_client/hardware/deebot/x5d34r.py

# Also check if there's any mapping between model names and these files
cat deebot_client/hardware/deebot/__init__.py

Length of output: 8078

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

1-1: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.

(B018)


1-1: Undefined name x5d34r

(F821)