feat(passport-azure-ad): Added cookieSameSite option to IOIDCStrategyOption

[benbakhar]

• Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
• Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
• Follow the advice from the readme.
• Avoid common mistakes.
• Run npm run lint package-name (or tsc if no tslint.json is present).

Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes: AzureAD/passport-azure-ad@cf04a06

[typescript-bot]

👋 Hi there! I’ve run some quick measurements against master and your PR. These metrics should help the humans reviewing this PR gauge whether it might negatively affect compile times or editor responsiveness for users who install these typings.

Let’s review the numbers, shall we?

Comparison details 📊

	master	#42115	diff
Batch compilation
Memory usage (MiB)	64.3	63.6	-1.0%
Type count	10713	10713	0%
Assignability cache size	3425	3425	0%
Language service
Samples taken	78	78	0%
Identifiers in tests	78	78	0%
getCompletionsAtPosition
Mean duration (ms)	292.1	292.9	+0.2%
Mean CV	13.0%	12.4%
Worst duration (ms)	349.8	335.4	-4.1%
Worst identifier	redirectUrl	passReqToCallback
getQuickInfoAtPosition
Mean duration (ms)	288.1	292.9	+1.7%
Mean CV	12.0%	13.1%	+9.6%
Worst duration (ms)	344.3	364.5	+5.9%
Worst identifier	bearerStrategyOptions	IOIDCStrategyOptionWithRequest

It looks like nothing changed too much. I won’t post performance data again unless it gets worse.

[typescript-bot]

@benbakhar Thank you for submitting this PR!

🔔 @ShekharNain - please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

If no reviewer appears after a week, a DefinitelyTyped maintainer will review the PR instead.

[typescript-bot]

After 5 days, no one has reviewed the PR 😞. A maintainer will be reviewing the PR in the next few days and will either merge it or request revisions. Thank you for your patience!