[faker] added faker.internet.port method#52252
[faker] added faker.internet.port method#52252typescript-bot merged 1 commit intoDefinitelyTyped:masterfrom
Conversation
|
@scarabedore Thank you for submitting this PR! This is a live comment which I will keep updated. 1 package in this PR
Code ReviewsBecause you edited one package and updated the tests (👏), I can help you merge this PR once someone else signs off on it. Status
All of the items on the list are green. To merge, you need to post a comment including the string "Ready to merge" to bring in your changes. Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR{
"type": "info",
"now": "-",
"pr_number": 52252,
"author": "scarabedore",
"headCommitOid": "3e891b06c77293519767ae57b45e01b4e721a938",
"lastPushDate": "2021-04-08T05:37:45.000Z",
"lastActivityDate": "2021-04-19T09:32:28.000Z",
"maintainerBlessed": false,
"mergeOfferDate": "2021-04-19T09:22:42.000Z",
"mergeRequestDate": "2021-04-19T09:32:28.000Z",
"mergeRequestUser": "pkuczynski",
"hasMergeConflict": false,
"isFirstContribution": false,
"popularityLevel": "Popular",
"pkgInfo": [
{
"name": "faker",
"kind": "edit",
"files": [
{
"path": "types/faker/faker-tests.ts",
"kind": "test"
},
{
"path": "types/faker/index.d.ts",
"kind": "definition"
}
],
"owners": [
"bensw",
"basp",
"Kuniwak",
"mattbishop",
"testica",
"TastefulElk",
"damonpam",
"heavenshell",
"pkuczynski"
],
"addedOwners": [],
"deletedOwners": [
"pkuczynski"
],
"popularityLevel": "Popular"
}
],
"reviews": [
{
"type": "approved",
"reviewer": "pkuczynski",
"date": "2021-04-19T09:22:05.000Z",
"isMaintainer": false
}
],
"ciResult": "pass"
} |
|
🔔 @bensw @basp @Kuniwak @mattbishop @testica @TastefulElk @damonpam @heavenshell @pkuczynski — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select |
|
👋 Hi there! I’ve run some quick measurements against master and your PR. These metrics should help the humans reviewing this PR gauge whether it might negatively affect compile times or editor responsiveness for users who install these typings. Let’s review the numbers, shall we? Comparison details 📊
First off, note that the system varied slightly between these two runs, so you’ll have to take these measurements with a grain of salt. It looks like nothing changed too much. I won’t post performance data again unless it gets worse. |
|
Re-ping @bensw, @basp, @Kuniwak, @mattbishop, @testica, @TastefulElk, @damonpam, @heavenshell, @pkuczynski: This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews. Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks! |
|
@scarabedore Everything looks good here. Great job! I am ready to merge this PR (at 3e891b0) on your behalf. If you'd like that to happen, please post a comment saying:
and I'll merge this PR almost instantly. Thanks for helping out! ❤️ (@bensw, @basp, @Kuniwak, @mattbishop, @testica, @TastefulElk, @damonpam, @heavenshell, @pkuczynski: you can do this too.) |
|
Ready to merge |
|
I just published |
Please fill in this template.
npm test <package to test>.Select one of these and delete the others:
If changing an existing definition: