Hack around remark-validate-link warnings

[amcasey]

It appears that remark-validate-link uses hosted-git-info to convert our GH permalink into a relative link (since it shares a prefix with our GH repo) and then warns that the relative link is dangling. This change uses URL encoding to defeat the tool's simple prefix matching.

Filed #58598 to investigate a real solution.

[typescript-bot]

@amcasey Thank you for submitting this PR!

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

This PR touches some part of DefinitelyTyped infrastructure, so a DT maintainer will need to review it. This is rare — did you mean to do this?

0 packages in this PR (and infra files)

• Infra files
  • README.es.md
  • README.it.md
  • README.ja.md
  • README.ko.md
  • README.md
  • README.pt.md
  • README.ru.md
  • README.zh.md

Code Reviews

There aren't any other owners of this package, so a DT maintainer will review it.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

• ✅ No merge conflicts
• ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
• 🕐 A DT maintainer needs to approve changes which affect DT infrastructure (README.es.md, README.it.md, README.ja.md, README.ko.md, README.md, README.pt.md, README.ru.md, README.zh.md)

Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.

---

Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR

{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 58599,
  "author": "amcasey",
  "headCommitOid": "b3c6a16668d620adecf4f9e5e8fd29ccc2060a18",
  "mergeBaseOid": "0c4fe9aa89dac0e458677e0f697bca253bccabed",
  "lastPushDate": "2022-02-04T01:47:24.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2022-02-04T01:47:56.000Z",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": null,
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "README.es.md",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        },
        {
          "path": "README.it.md",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        },
        {
          "path": "README.ja.md",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        },
        {
          "path": "README.ko.md",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        },
        {
          "path": "README.md",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        },
        {
          "path": "README.pt.md",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        },
        {
          "path": "README.ru.md",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        },
        {
          "path": "README.zh.md",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Critical"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [],
  "mainBotCommentID": 1029565410,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

[typescript-bot]

🔔 @amcasey — there are no owners, but it would still be good if you find someone to review this PR in the next few days, otherwise a maintainer will look at it. (And if you do find someone, maybe even recruit them to be a second owner to make future changes easier...)