Fix fs-extra usage in scripts

[remcohaszing]

fs-extra was not added as a dependency. Scripts that were using fs-extra relied on an indirect dependency on an older version of fs-extra. These scripts only used functions that fs-extra exports from fs. The latest version of fs-extra doesn’t even export these in the ESM export, only in the CJS export. So while my original idea was to update to the latest version of fs-extra, instead I removed the dependency entirely.

Please fill in this template.

• Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
• Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
• Add or edit tests to reflect the change.
• Follow the advice from the readme.
• Avoid common mistakes.
• Run npm test <package to test>.

[typescript-bot]

@remcohaszing Thank you for submitting this PR!

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

This PR touches some part of DefinitelyTyped infrastructure, so a DT maintainer will need to review it. This is rare — did you mean to do this?

0 packages in this PR (and infra files)

• Infra files
  • scripts/ghostbuster.js
  • scripts/update-codeowners.js

Code Reviews

There aren't any other owners of this package, so a DT maintainer will review it.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

• ✅ No merge conflicts
• ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
• 🕐 A DT maintainer needs to approve changes which affect DT infrastructure (scripts/ghostbuster.js, scripts/update-codeowners.js)

Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.

---

Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR

{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 63732,
  "author": "remcohaszing",
  "headCommitOid": "c6280b02bb009051d0f47971004dbfbd2a50066b",
  "mergeBaseOid": "209ad4dd77c99181de178fba15ad8ff01841b4ef",
  "lastPushDate": "2022-12-26T12:46:31.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2022-12-26T12:47:37.000Z",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": null,
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "scripts/ghostbuster.js",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        },
        {
          "path": "scripts/update-codeowners.js",
          "kind": "infrastructure"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Critical"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [],
  "mainBotCommentID": 1365145004,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

[typescript-bot]

🔔 @remcohaszing — there are no owners, but it would still be good if you find someone to review this PR in the next few days, otherwise a maintainer will look at it. (And if you do find someone, maybe even recruit them to be a second owner to make future changes easier...)