Skip to content

Conversation

@spashii
Copy link
Member

@spashii spashii commented Jul 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced parallel workflow steps and additional logging in operations, including new environment variable logging for improved visibility.
    • Added a new one-to-many field for aspect segments, enhancing data relationships in the interface.
  • Improvements

    • Updated relation handling so deleting an aspect will now cascade and remove related aspect segments.
    • Enhanced configuration to support new environment variables for external topic modeling services.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Implemented the previously non-functional "create view" task, enabling it to process project analysis runs and interact with external services as intended.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This change introduces duplicate workflow operations in operations.json with new IDs and slightly altered resolve/reject paths, adds a new log node for environment variables, and implements a new one-to-many field in the Directus aspect schema. The dembrane backend now fully implements the task_create_view function, integrating project and segment retrieval with an external topic modeling service via HTTP.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json Duplicates existing operations with new _syncId values and resolve/reject IDs; adds a new log node for env vars.
echo/directus/sync/snapshot/fields/aspect/aspect_segment.json Adds a new alias field aspect_segment to the aspect collection as a one-to-many list interface.
echo/directus/sync/snapshot/fields/aspect_segment/aspect.json Updates the special metadata attribute from "m2o" to null in the aspect_segment collection.
echo/directus/sync/snapshot/relations/aspect_segment/aspect.json Sets one_field to aspect_segment and changes on_delete from SET NULL to CASCADE in relation metadata.
echo/server/dembrane/config.py Adds environment variable handling and logging for RUNPOD_TOPIC_MODELER_URL and its API key.
echo/server/dembrane/tasks.py Implements task_create_view: fetches project/segment data, calls external topic modeler API, adds error handling.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Backend (task_create_view)
    participant Directus
    participant TopicModelerAPI

    User->>Backend (task_create_view): Request with project_analysis_run_id, user_query, context, language
    Backend->>Directus: Get project_analysis_run by ID
    Directus-->>Backend: Return project_id
    Backend->>Directus: Get project by project_id (fetch conversations and segment IDs)
    Directus-->>Backend: Return nested conversation segment IDs
    Backend->>Backend: Flatten & deduplicate segment IDs, build prompt
    Backend->>TopicModelerAPI: POST / (segment IDs, prompt, language, run_id)
    TopicModelerAPI-->>Backend: Response (not handled in this flow)
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • fix syncids #220: Also modifies operations.json focusing on updating UUID references for _syncId, resolve, and reject fields, indicating overlap in workflow operation configuration.

Suggested labels

Feature

Suggested reviewers

  • ussaama
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot requested a review from ussaama July 17, 2025 08:37
@spashii spashii enabled auto-merge July 17, 2025 08:37
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot added the Feature label Jul 17, 2025
Copy link

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Unchecked Query Results Lead to IndexError

IndexError occurs in task_create_view when accessing response[0]["project_id"] or segments[0]["conversations"] without checking if the client.get_items queries for project_analysis_run or project return any results.

echo/server/dembrane/tasks.py#L443-L444

)
project_id = response[0]["project_id"]

Fix in CursorFix in Web


Bug: Duplicate Workflow Operations Cause Sync Conflicts

The echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json file contains multiple duplicate workflow operations. Entries such as "Check Language", "Check Report Language", and "Dutch" are duplicated, having identical names and keys but distinct _syncId values and resolve/reject references. This issue causes workflow conflicts and unpredictable behavior, likely due to the sync process creating new operations instead of updating existing ones.

echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json#L21-L603

https://github.com/Dembrane/echo/blob/5237ccd01d036027dc98432f162573ed9a5d9066/echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json#L21-L603

Fix in CursorFix in Web


Bug: Directus Response Handling Flaws

The task_create_view function performs unsafe access to segments[0] and nested dictionary keys (conversations, conversation_segments) without validation, leading to IndexError, KeyError, or TypeError if the Directus response is empty or has an unexpected structure. Furthermore, it uses RUNPOD_TOPIC_MODELER_URL and RUNPOD_TOPIC_MODELER_API_KEY without None checks, which can result in invalid URLs or malformed request headers.

echo/server/dembrane/tasks.py#L456-L478

)
segment_ids = list(
set(
[
seg["id"]
for conv in segments[0]["conversations"]
for seg in conv["conversation_segments"]
]
)
)
headers = {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Authorization": f"Bearer {RUNPOD_TOPIC_MODELER_API_KEY}",
}
data = {
"input": {
"response_language": language,
"segment_ids": segment_ids,
"user_prompt": "\n\n\n".join([user_query, user_query_context]),
"project_analysis_run_id": project_analysis_run_id,
}
}
url = f"{str(RUNPOD_TOPIC_MODELER_URL).rstrip('/')}/run"

Fix in CursorFix in Web


Bug: API URL Validation and Response Handling

The RUNPOD_TOPIC_MODELER_URL can be None, which causes the requests.post URL to become None/run and the request to fail. Additionally, the response from the requests.post call is not checked for success, leading to unhandled API errors.

echo/server/dembrane/tasks.py#L477-L480

}
url = f"{str(RUNPOD_TOPIC_MODELER_URL).rstrip('/')}/run"
response = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=data, timeout=600)

Fix in CursorFix in Web


Was this report helpful? Give feedback by reacting with 👍 or 👎

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 13

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7fe142e and 5237ccd.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json (13 hunks)
  • echo/directus/sync/snapshot/fields/aspect/aspect_segment.json (1 hunks)
  • echo/directus/sync/snapshot/fields/aspect_segment/aspect.json (1 hunks)
  • echo/directus/sync/snapshot/relations/aspect_segment/aspect.json (2 hunks)
  • echo/server/dembrane/config.py (1 hunks)
  • echo/server/dembrane/tasks.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: spashii
PR: Dembrane/echo#142
File: echo/frontend/src/lib/query.ts:730-740
Timestamp: 2025-05-13T15:18:29.107Z
Learning: When working with Directus API in this codebase, foreign key relationships must be specified using nested objects with `id` properties (e.g., `conversation_id: { id: conversationId } as Conversation`) rather than direct ID values, even though this appears redundant.
echo/directus/sync/snapshot/relations/aspect_segment/aspect.json (1)
Learnt from: spashii
PR: Dembrane/echo#142
File: echo/frontend/src/lib/query.ts:730-740
Timestamp: 2025-05-13T15:18:29.107Z
Learning: When working with Directus API in this codebase, foreign key relationships must be specified using nested objects with `id` properties (e.g., `conversation_id: { id: conversationId } as Conversation`) rather than direct ID values, even though this appears redundant.
echo/server/dembrane/config.py (2)
Learnt from: ArindamRoy23
PR: Dembrane/echo#113
File: echo/server/dembrane/postgresdbmanager.py:23-40
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T08:45:19.122Z
Learning: Environment variables in the Echo project are defined and validated in `config.py` and should be imported from there rather than accessing `os.environ` directly in other modules. This ensures consistent validation, default values, and logging throughout the application.
Learnt from: ArindamRoy23
PR: Dembrane/echo#113
File: echo/server/dembrane/postgresdbmanager.py:23-40
Timestamp: 2025-04-18T08:45:19.122Z
Learning: Environment variables in the Echo project are defined and validated in `config.py` and should be imported from there rather than accessing `os.environ` directly in other modules. This ensures consistent validation, default values, and logging throughout the application.
echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json (1)
Learnt from: ussaama
PR: Dembrane/echo#90
File: echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json:132-145
Timestamp: 2025-03-31T10:29:01.012Z
Learning: In Directus flow operations of type "exec", template variables like {{$env.VARIABLE_NAME}} should be used without quotes in JavaScript code as they are processed by the Directus flow engine before JavaScript execution.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Cursor BugBot
  • GitHub Check: ci-check-server
🔇 Additional comments (7)
echo/server/dembrane/config.py (1)

204-212: LGTM! Clean config pattern implementation.

The RunPod topic modeler configuration follows the established patterns perfectly. The conditional assertion for the API key when URL is set is solid engineering - no auth token dangling without an endpoint to hit.

echo/directus/sync/snapshot/fields/aspect_segment/aspect.json (1)

19-19: LGTM! Schema refactoring in progress.

Nullifying the m2o special designation as part of the broader relationship restructuring between aspect and aspect_segment collections. Clean coordination with the other schema changes.

echo/directus/sync/snapshot/relations/aspect_segment/aspect.json (1)

13-13: LGTM! Solid relationship engineering.

Setting the one_field to establish bidirectional relations and CASCADE delete for proper data consistency. When you delete an aspect, the segments should go with it - clean data model design.

Also applies to: 23-23

echo/directus/sync/snapshot/fields/aspect/aspect_segment.json (1)

1-31: LGTM! Clean alias field setup.

Perfect one-to-many alias field configuration. The list-o2m interface with segment.id template and enableLink will give users a smooth experience managing the relationship. Well-architected Directus field definition.

echo/server/dembrane/tasks.py (2)

17-23: LGTM! Clean imports for the new functionality.

Adding the necessary config variables and directus_client_context import. Following the established import patterns in the codebase.


431-483: LGTM! Solid RunPod pipeline implementation.

The task_create_view function is well-architected:

  • Proper use of directus_client_context for DB operations
  • Smart nested query to fetch conversation segments in one go
  • Using set() for unique segment IDs is efficient
  • Clean HTTP request construction with proper headers
  • Error handling with logging maintains observability

The 600-second timeout is aggressive but reasonable for topic modeling workloads. The payload structure looks clean and the Bearer auth pattern is solid.

echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json (1)

247-272: get_all_participants item-read duplicated – possible dangling resolves.

Ensure downstream nodes reference the surviving operation after dedupe.

Comment on lines +114 to +133
{
"name": "Dutch",
"key": "dutch",
"type": "condition",
"position_x": 20,
"position_y": 20,
"options": {
"filter": {
"$trigger": {
"language": {
"_eq": "nl"
}
}
}
},
"resolve": "ea78ec02-364d-4f18-80f8-ea5ac4c787ed",
"reject": "eb6f8253-647f-4fb1-9010-e93594ba065e",
"flow": "17703446-fef0-49e9-bdc4-385db1311137",
"_syncId": "4795cc24-3f3c-4be9-9844-24552da522fa"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ditto for "dutch" condition node.

Unique keys or bust – else the NL branch erases itself.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json around lines 114 to 133, the
"dutch" condition node's "key" must be unique to prevent conflicts that cause
the NL branch to overwrite itself. Review the "key" value and ensure it is
unique within the file by changing it to a distinct identifier that does not
duplicate any other keys.

Comment on lines +419 to +431
"name": "Report Not Published",
"key": "report_not_published",
"type": "log",
"position_x": 19,
"position_y": 19,
"options": {
"message": "The report is not yet published"
},
"resolve": null,
"reject": null,
"flow": "ec4e7ea5-72de-4365-b66f-d8f11b549495",
"_syncId": "e8274ad4-5844-42cd-8a6b-d40d08cf83d3"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

report_not_published logger duplicated.

Minor, but still a key collision; cleanup recommended.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json around lines 419 to 431, there
is a duplicate logger entry with the key "report_not_published" causing a key
collision. Locate and remove or rename one of the duplicate entries to ensure
each logger key is unique and avoid conflicts.

Comment on lines +350 to +371
{
"name": "PROCEED_ONLY_IF \"published\" in payload",
"key": "proceed_only_if_published_in_payload",
"type": "condition",
"position_x": 19,
"position_y": 1,
"options": {
"filter": {
"$trigger": {
"payload": {
"status": {
"_eq": "published"
}
}
}
}
},
"resolve": "d8554457-95b6-474f-ba67-dfd5f936d575",
"reject": "e8274ad4-5844-42cd-8a6b-d40d08cf83d3",
"flow": "ec4e7ea5-72de-4365-b66f-d8f11b549495",
"_syncId": "2784a141-2ae3-48d1-aedf-57c0be3bcc74"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Second "proceed_only_if_published_in_payload" – key clash again.

Resolve/reject IDs diverge; post-import you’ll only have one of them, breaking the other branch.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json between lines 350 and 371,
there is a duplicate key "proceed_only_if_published_in_payload" causing a key
clash. This results in conflicting resolve and reject IDs that will break one of
the branches after import. To fix this, rename one of the duplicate keys to a
unique identifier and ensure its resolve and reject IDs correctly correspond to
the intended flow branches.

Comment on lines +148 to +161
{
"name": "Email Send Operation Failed",
"key": "email_send_operation_failed",
"type": "log",
"position_x": 58,
"position_y": 1,
"options": {
"message": "An email could not be sent due to some error: {{$last}}"
},
"resolve": null,
"reject": null,
"flow": "17703446-fef0-49e9-bdc4-385db1311137",
"_syncId": "2b24450b-6a2e-4452-aba1-9814d17fef42"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Two "email_send_operation_failed" log nodes = one actually synced.

You’ll lose one set of resolve/reject plumbing. Rename or merge.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json around lines 148 to 161, there
are two log nodes with the key "email_send_operation_failed," which causes a
conflict and loss of resolve/reject plumbing. To fix this, rename one of the
duplicate keys to a unique name or merge the two nodes into a single one,
ensuring that resolve and reject handlers are preserved and correctly linked.

Comment on lines +68 to +93
{
"name": "Check Report Language",
"key": "check_report_language",
"type": "item-read",
"position_x": 73,
"position_y": 1,
"options": {
"query": {
"filter": {
"project_id": {
"id": {
"_eq": "{{$trigger.payload.project_id.id}}"
}
}
},
"fields": [
"language"
]
},
"collection": "project_report"
},
"resolve": "ca1ffbc5-cfce-4fb4-8f15-c128ea407d41",
"reject": null,
"flow": "ec4e7ea5-72de-4365-b66f-d8f11b549495",
"_syncId": "c5d2aff3-1a1a-4ea2-8e39-5189409b7dc1"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Same collision for "check_report_language" – import chaos ahead.

Identical key, different _syncId. One wins, one dies. Fix like above.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json between lines 68 and 93, the
"check_report_language" key is duplicated with different _syncId values, causing
a collision. To fix this, ensure each operation key is unique by renaming one of
the "check_report_language" keys to a distinct name or merging the operations if
appropriate, and update the corresponding _syncId to maintain uniqueness.

Comment on lines +22 to +41
{
"name": "Check Language",
"key": "check_language",
"type": "condition",
"position_x": 20,
"position_y": 1,
"options": {
"filter": {
"$trigger": {
"language": {
"_eq": "en"
}
}
}
},
"resolve": "9390ed2f-7dc6-4a6a-83da-2d87d478261d",
"reject": "4795cc24-3f3c-4be9-9844-24552da522fa",
"flow": "17703446-fef0-49e9-bdc4-385db1311137",
"_syncId": "af7a671d-78fa-4d07-adad-c3bfabc4617c"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Duplicate key will clobber the original operation at import-time.

Directus Flow requires key be unique per flow. A second "check_language" with the same key but a different _syncId means only one of them survives the sync, nuking the other branch and potentially breaking resolve9390ed2f-….
Rename the key or delete the clone before shipping.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json around lines 22 to 41, there
are duplicate "key" values named "check_language" which will cause one to
overwrite the other during import. To fix this, ensure each operation has a
unique "key" by renaming one of the duplicate keys or removing the duplicate
operation entirely before syncing to prevent breaking the flow connections.

Comment on lines +395 to +417
{
"name": "Project Data",
"key": "project_data",
"type": "item-read",
"position_x": 37,
"position_y": 1,
"options": {
"collection": "project",
"query": {
"filter": {
"id": {
"id": {
"_eq": "{{$trigger.payload.project_id}}"
}
}
}
}
},
"resolve": "47f1463c-3cb6-4420-a50e-92938fed3197",
"reject": null,
"flow": "ec4e7ea5-72de-4365-b66f-d8f11b549495",
"_syncId": "d8554457-95b6-474f-ba67-dfd5f936d575"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Duplicate "project_data" item-read node.

Same collision pattern – rename or remove.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json between lines 395 and 417,
there is a duplicate item-read node with the key "project_data" causing a
collision. To fix this, either rename one of the duplicate "project_data" keys
to a unique identifier or remove the redundant node to avoid conflicts in the
flow.

Comment on lines +509 to +538
"name": "Send Email English",
"key": "send_email_english",
"type": "mail",
"position_x": 39,
"position_y": 1,
"options": {
"to": [
"{{$trigger.email}}"
],
"subject": "A Report Featuring Your Input is Ready",
"body": null,
"type": "template",
"template": "report-notification-en",
"data": {
"PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL": "{{$trigger.PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL}}",
"project_id": "{{$trigger.project_id}}",
"project_name": "{{$trigger.project_name}}",
"default_conversation_title": "{{$trigger.default_conversation_title}}",
"conversation_name": "{{$trigger.conversation_name}}",
"token": "{{$trigger.token}}"
},
"replyTo": [
"info@dembrane.com"
]
},
"resolve": null,
"reject": "2b24450b-6a2e-4452-aba1-9814d17fef42",
"flow": "17703446-fef0-49e9-bdc4-385db1311137",
"_syncId": "9390ed2f-7dc6-4a6a-83da-2d87d478261d"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Two "send_email_english" mailers – same fatal collision.

Unique keys or nothing works.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json between lines 509 and 538,
there are two mailer entries with the identical key "send_email_english,"
causing a fatal collision. To fix this, ensure each mailer has a unique "key"
value by renaming one of the duplicate keys to a distinct identifier. This will
prevent conflicts and allow the system to differentiate between the mailers.

Comment on lines +447 to +476
"name": "Send Email Dutch",
"key": "send_email_dutch",
"type": "mail",
"position_x": 39,
"position_y": 20,
"options": {
"to": [
"{{$trigger.email}}"
],
"type": "template",
"subject": "Er is een rapport klaar met uw inbreng",
"body": null,
"data": {
"PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL": "{{$trigger.PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL}}",
"project_id": "{{$trigger.project_id}}",
"project_name": "{{$trigger.project_name}}",
"default_conversation_title": "{{$trigger.default_conversation_title}}",
"conversation_name": "{{$trigger.conversation_name}}",
"token": "{{$trigger.token}}"
},
"template": "report-notification-nl",
"replyTo": [
"info@dembrane.com"
]
},
"resolve": null,
"reject": "615a54cd-a72e-41ad-9403-9577c80280d6",
"flow": "17703446-fef0-49e9-bdc4-385db1311137",
"_syncId": "ea78ec02-364d-4f18-80f8-ea5ac4c787ed"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Two "send_email_dutch" mailers – one will disappear.

Avoid key overwrites, otherwise NL users may get ghosted.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json around lines 447 to 476, there
are two mailer entries with the same key "send_email_dutch", which causes one to
overwrite the other and leads to issues for Dutch users. To fix this, ensure
each mailer has a unique "key" value by renaming one of the duplicate keys to a
distinct identifier to prevent overwriting and ensure both mailers function
correctly.

Comment on lines +301 to +313
"name": "log environment vars",
"key": "log_environment_vars",
"type": "log",
"position_x": 127,
"position_y": 1,
"options": {
"message": "{{data['$env']}} {{data.$env}} {{process.env}} {{$env}} {{$env.PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL}}"
},
"resolve": null,
"reject": null,
"flow": "ec4e7ea5-72de-4365-b66f-d8f11b549495",
"_syncId": "7161e52e-b1cc-4c13-bedd-a9d64527026f"
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Logging full $env and process.env leaks secrets.

Dumping every env var to Directus logs is a GDPR/ops nightmare.
Log only the specific var you need, or strip this node in prod.

-      "message": "{{data['$env']}}  {{data.$env}} {{process.env}} {{$env}} {{$env.PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL}}"
+      "message": "PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL: {{$env.PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL}}"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"name": "log environment vars",
"key": "log_environment_vars",
"type": "log",
"position_x": 127,
"position_y": 1,
"options": {
"message": "{{data['$env']}} {{data.$env}} {{process.env}} {{$env}} {{$env.PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL}}"
},
"resolve": null,
"reject": null,
"flow": "ec4e7ea5-72de-4365-b66f-d8f11b549495",
"_syncId": "7161e52e-b1cc-4c13-bedd-a9d64527026f"
},
"name": "log environment vars",
"key": "log_environment_vars",
"type": "log",
"position_x": 127,
"position_y": 1,
"options": {
"message": "PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL: {{$env.PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL}}"
},
"resolve": null,
"reject": null,
"flow": "ec4e7ea5-72de-4365-b66f-d8f11b549495",
"_syncId": "7161e52e-b1cc-4c13-bedd-a9d64527026f"
},
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In echo/directus/sync/collections/operations.json around lines 301 to 313, the
current log action outputs the entire environment variables object, which risks
leaking sensitive information. Modify the "message" option to log only the
specific environment variable needed, such as "PARTICIPANT_BASE_URL", instead of
dumping all of process.env or $env. Alternatively, implement a condition to skip
or sanitize this log step in production environments to prevent sensitive data
exposure.

@ArindamRoy23
Copy link
Contributor

All ok

Copy link
Contributor

@ArindamRoy23 ArindamRoy23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All ok

@spashii spashii added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 76a48dd Jul 17, 2025
12 checks passed
@spashii spashii deleted the feat/runpod-views-link branch October 30, 2025 12:03
spashii added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants