Focus on idea over preliminary eval

[jssmith1]

• The evaluation as admitted by the authors is very preliminary. I wondered given the
  limited idea of strengths and weaknesses from this just how much the paper really
  shows about the proposed approach (good or bad) - perhaps again more focus on the
  “interesting idea” via more on the tool/usage example would be better vs evaluation
  detail?
• evaluation is preliminary / nuclear just what learned

[jssmith1]

• It is good that the paper includes some empirical support for the utility of this tool, but its inability to meet the effectiveness of the existing tool for task 2 (Section VI / Branching and Backtracking) suggests that it needs further work