Quick changes (from Tutorial Overhaul #1) #1489
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Quick changes (15-01-2022)
Quick changes (15-01-2022)
notmanz
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just a couple of changes. Cheers to everyone that points out the misinformation / adds additional info for it! :)
Note: I've been planning to do another Overhaul on FAQ (scheduled for Overhaul #3), which enforce the faq to split into a dedicated markdown file (it's way too cluttered now and it's best to split it at ease).
(For Dex) Is it possible to just split the FAQ files & still compile / show it as one FAQ tutorial in-game? To show the separated FAQ, I'm just doing a quick hyperlink on main FAQ file, so that it redirects to a sub tutorial for specific FAQ. It's a way to make it more feasible and easy to manage. Also yeah, the tutorial hyperlink (on previous merge) works perfectly (thank god 😄)