Skip to content

Add step validation memory configuration and test suite for step sear…#105

Merged
csmangum merged 1 commit intomainfrom
dev
May 8, 2025
Merged

Add step validation memory configuration and test suite for step sear…#105
csmangum merged 1 commit intomainfrom
dev

Conversation

@csmangum
Copy link
Contributor

@csmangum csmangum commented May 8, 2025

…ch strategy

This commit introduces a new JSON configuration file for step validation memory, detailing agent memories and their associated metadata. Additionally, a comprehensive test suite for the StepBasedSearchStrategy is implemented, covering basic, advanced, and edge case tests to ensure robust functionality and performance in memory searches.

This pull request introduces a new step search test suite and corresponding memory sample configuration for validating the StepBasedSearchStrategy. The changes include the addition of a comprehensive test suite with basic, advanced, and edge case tests, as well as a detailed memory configuration file to support these tests.

Test Suite Implementation:

  • validation/search/step/step_test_suite.py: Added a new StepSearchTestSuite class to validate the StepBasedSearchStrategy. The test suite includes methods for running basic, advanced, and edge case tests, covering functionality such as step range searches, metadata filtering, tier-specific searches, and handling invalid or edge case inputs.

Memory Configuration:

  • validation/memory_samples/step_validation_memory.json: Added a memory sample configuration file to support the step search test suite. This file defines memory records across short-term, intermediate, and long-term tiers, with metadata for filtering and validation purposes.

…ch strategy

This commit introduces a new JSON configuration file for step validation memory, detailing agent memories and their associated metadata. Additionally, a comprehensive test suite for the StepBasedSearchStrategy is implemented, covering basic, advanced, and edge case tests to ensure robust functionality and performance in memory searches.
@csmangum csmangum requested a review from Copilot May 8, 2025 02:12
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request introduces a comprehensive test suite for the StepBasedSearchStrategy alongside a new memory configuration file for validating memory records.

  • Added a new test suite in step_test_suite.py covering basic, advanced, and edge case tests for various search scenarios.
  • Introduced a JSON memory configuration file (step_validation_memory.json) defining agent memories across different tiers.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
validation/search/step/step_test_suite.py Added a new test suite with multiple tests for step range, metadata, and tier inputs.
validation/memory_samples/step_validation_memory.json Added a detailed JSON configuration file to support the step search tests.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

validation/search/step/step_test_suite.py:29

  • [nitpick] If these constants are used across multiple methods or instances, consider moving them to class-level attributes to improve clarity and maintainability.
        STRATEGY_NAME = "step_based"

# Test 2: Reference step search
self.runner.run_test(
"Reference Step Search",
"200",
Copy link

Copilot AI May 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider using a consistent numeric type (e.g. int) for step inputs across tests rather than passing a string value, as inconsistent types may lead to ambiguous behavior.

Suggested change
"200",
200,

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@csmangum csmangum merged commit 8a4574f into main May 8, 2025
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants