-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
add Dockerfile for container providing easy access to EESSI pilot repository #35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@bedroge Let's merge this, container for clients that want to play with the pilot repo has proved to be working well? |
bedroge
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, except that I have another PR (#36) which also adds files to this containers dir. That PR uses a README.md, though. Can we try making them compatible, by for instance renaming your README to README.md and describing this container in a specific section?
containers/README
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | |||
| Docker container to provide easy access to EESSI pilot repository, | |||
| see https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/eessi/client-pilot and https://eessi.github.io/docs/pilot . | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You will really have to make my day first ;-)
| see https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/eessi/client-pilot and https://eessi.github.io/docs/pilot . | |
| see https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/eessi/client-pilot and https://eessi.github.io/docs/pilot. |
…and + use latest cvmfs-config-eessi RPM
85f2c91 to
308bd93
Compare
308bd93 to
350ff10
Compare
|
@bedroge I think this is good to go now... |
Co-authored-by: Bob Dröge <b.e.droge@rug.nl>
… to download it first
543761b to
07f3318
Compare
bedroge
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Haven't been able to test the Arm image on my RPi, but it looks good to me.
Doesn't include
fuse-overlayfs, since pure clients don't really need that.