Skip to content

Conversation

@MallanagoudaB
Copy link
Collaborator

@MallanagoudaB MallanagoudaB commented Nov 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Health check responses now report the actual service version instead of a hardcoded value.
  • Improvements

    • Health check flow updated to accept and propagate dynamic version information through responses.
  • Chores

    • Package version incremented to publish the update.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Walkthrough

healthCheckHandler now accepts a serviceVersion argument which is passed to formatResponse; formatResponse uses serviceVersion to populate the response version instead of a hardcoded value. The package version is bumped from 0.0.7 to 0.0.8.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Health Check Handler
health-check/index.js
Updated healthCheckHandler(config, basicCheck = false, currentServiceName = '')healthCheckHandler(config, basicCheck = false, currentServiceName = '', serviceVersion); updated formatResponse(result)formatResponse(result, serviceVersion) and threaded serviceVersion into the response building.
Package Metadata
health-check/package.json
Bumped package version from 0.0.7 to 0.0.8.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant HealthCheckHandler as Handler
    participant FormatResponse as Formatter

    Caller->>Handler: healthCheckHandler(config, basicCheck, currentServiceName, serviceVersion)
    activate Handler
    Note right of Handler: perform health checks (sync/async)
    Handler->>Formatter: formatResponse(result, serviceVersion)
    activate Formatter
    Note right of Formatter: build response using serviceVersion
    Formatter-->>Handler: formattedResponse
    deactivate Formatter
    Handler-->>Caller: health check response
    deactivate Handler
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Verify serviceVersion is correctly threaded from entry point to formatResponse.
  • Check callers (if any outside this diff) for compatibility with the new parameter.
  • Confirm package.json version bump is intentional.

Poem

🐰 A tiny version hop, neat and spry,

I pass my number, no more a lie.
Through handler and formatter I leap,
Into health responses, snug and deep. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'getting-version-from-package-file' is vague and does not clearly convey the actual changes made in the pull request. Use a more descriptive title that clearly explains the main change, such as 'Make health check service version dynamic' or 'Add serviceVersion parameter to health check handler'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch versionChange

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
health-check/index.js (2)

12-19: Missing parameter validation and documentation.

The new serviceVersion parameter lacks validation and JSDoc documentation. If callers don't provide this parameter, undefined will flow into the response.

Apply this diff to add validation and update the JSDoc:

 /**
  * Perform health checks for various services.
  *
  * @param {Object} config - The configuration object containing service health settings.
  * @param {boolean} basicCheck - If true, includes microservice health checks.
  * @param {string} [currentServiceName=''] - Optional. Name of the current service to avoid self-check.
+ * @param {string} serviceVersion - The version of the service to include in the response.
  * @returns {Promise<Object>} - A formatted response with health check results.
  */
 async function healthCheckHandler(config, basicCheck = false, currentServiceName = '', serviceVersion) {
 	validateHealthConfig(config)
+	if (!serviceVersion) {
+		throw new Error('serviceVersion parameter is required')
+	}
 	const checks = []

190-196: Update JSDoc to reflect the new parameter.

The JSDoc comment doesn't document the serviceVersion parameter.

Apply this diff to update the documentation:

 /**
  * Format the final health check response in a standard structure.
  *
  * @param {Object} result - The object containing service name, version, healthy status, and checks.
+ * @param {string} serviceVersion - The version of the service to include in the response.
  * @returns {Object} - The formatted response object.
  */
 function formatResponse(result, serviceVersion) {
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
health-check/index.js (1)

199-199: Add fallback for undefined serviceVersion.

Using serviceVersion directly without a fallback will result in undefined being set as the version if the parameter isn't provided.

Consider adding a fallback:

-		version: serviceVersion,
+		version: serviceVersion || 'unknown',
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5181a9 and 96f232a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • health-check/index.js (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 342
File: health-check/services/kafka.js:49-54
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learning: In the ELEVATE-Project/utils health-check module, validation for Kafka configuration including groupId is performed in the parent file (health-check/index.js) in the validateHealthConfig function, not in the individual service files like health-check/services/kafka.js.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 342
File: health-check/services/kafka.js:49-54
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learning: In the ELEVATE-Project/utils health-check module, when updating function signatures to add new parameters, both the service file and the parent file (health-check/index.js) that calls the function need to be updated to pass all required parameters.

Applied to files:

  • health-check/index.js
📚 Learning: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 342
File: health-check/services/kafka.js:49-54
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learning: In the ELEVATE-Project/utils health-check module, validation for Kafka configuration including groupId is performed in the parent file (health-check/index.js) in the validateHealthConfig function, not in the individual service files like health-check/services/kafka.js.

Applied to files:

  • health-check/index.js
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
health-check/index.js (1)
health-check/services/kafka.js (1)
  • kafka (8-8)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
health-check/index.js (2)

38-38: LGTM! Kafka groupId properly propagated.

The groupId parameter is correctly passed to the Kafka health check, and validation is already in place at lines 166-168.

Based on learnings


98-105: Based on my verification, I found that:

  1. healthCheckHandler is exported from health-check/index.js and appears to be used by external services outside this repository
  2. The formatResponse function creates a response with version: serviceVersion (line 199) at the top level
  3. The result object nested inside (line 209) contains config.version

This creates a response structure with two version fields at different nesting levels. However, since the callers of healthCheckHandler are external to this repository (not found in the search results), I cannot verify whether serviceVersion is being passed correctly by all callers or whether both version fields are intentional.

Given the learning note about updating both service and parent files when modifying function signatures, if serviceVersion was recently added as a parameter, external services calling this handler need to be updated as well.

Verify external service integrations pass the serviceVersion parameter correctly, and confirm whether dual version fields in the response are by design.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
health-check/index.js (1)

105-105: Fix spacing after comma.

The logic correctly passes serviceVersion to formatResponse, but there's a minor formatting issue.

Apply this diff:

-	return formatResponse(result,serviceVersion)
+	return formatResponse(result, serviceVersion)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 96f232a and d032e9e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • health-check/index.js (3 hunks)
  • health-check/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • health-check/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 342
File: health-check/services/kafka.js:49-54
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learning: In the ELEVATE-Project/utils health-check module, when updating function signatures to add new parameters, both the service file and the parent file (health-check/index.js) that calls the function need to be updated to pass all required parameters.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 342
File: health-check/services/kafka.js:49-54
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learning: In the ELEVATE-Project/utils health-check module, when updating function signatures to add new parameters, both the service file and the parent file (health-check/index.js) that calls the function need to be updated to pass all required parameters.

Applied to files:

  • health-check/index.js
📚 Learning: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 342
File: health-check/services/kafka.js:49-54
Timestamp: 2025-08-20T10:33:46.359Z
Learning: In the ELEVATE-Project/utils health-check module, validation for Kafka configuration including groupId is performed in the parent file (health-check/index.js) in the validateHealthConfig function, not in the individual service files like health-check/services/kafka.js.

Applied to files:

  • health-check/index.js

@VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs merged commit db960c5 into master Nov 10, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants