Skip to content

Conversation

@MallanagoudaB
Copy link
Collaborator

@MallanagoudaB MallanagoudaB commented Dec 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added endpoints for deleting solution resources in the survey service.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Walkthrough

Two new POST route definitions for deleting solution resources were added to the survey service routing configuration. The package version was incremented from 1.0.21 to 1.0.22. Both changes are standard configuration updates supporting new survey service endpoints.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Route configuration
elevate-survey/constants/routes.js
Added two new public route entries for deleteSolutionResource operations (/survey/v1/admin/deleteSolutionResource and /survey/v1/admin/deleteSolutionResource/:id), both POST type with inSequence: false, inserted before the existing deleteResource route
Version bump
elevate-survey/package.json
Updated package version from 1.0.21 to 1.0.22

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Route additions follow existing patterns with consistent structure
  • Version bump is automatic/mechanical
  • No complex logic or conditional changes to evaluate

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs

Poem

🐰 A hop down the route path so true,
DeleteSolution now responds to you,
With version bumped to point-two-two,
The surveys flow through, fresh and new!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title is vague and generic. It refers to a version bump but does not clearly describe the main functional change, which is adding two new API route definitions for deleteSolutionResource endpoints. Revise the title to clearly describe the primary change, such as 'Add deleteSolutionResource admin API routes' or 'Add new survey admin endpoints for solution resource deletion'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch VersionFix

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
elevate-survey/constants/routes.js (1)

3025-3044: Consider adding the orchestrated property for consistency.

While the orchestrated property is optional, most routes in this file explicitly set it. For consistency with similar admin delete routes (lines 3046-3064) and better maintainability, consider adding orchestrated: false to both new route definitions.

Apply this diff:

         {
             sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deleteSolutionResource",
             type: "POST",
             inSequence: false,
+            orchestrated: false,
             targetRoute: {
                 path: "/survey/v1/admin/deleteSolutionResource",
                 type: "POST"
             },
             service: "survey"
         },
         {
             sourceRoute: "/survey/v1/admin/deleteSolutionResource/:id",
             type: "POST",
             inSequence: false,
+            orchestrated: false,
             targetRoute: {
                 path: "/survey/v1/admin/deleteSolutionResource/:id",
                 type: "POST"
             },
             service: "survey"
         },

Based on learnings, the orchestrated property is optional in this codebase.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 169e13a and eb37ddd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • elevate-survey/constants/routes.js (1 hunks)
  • elevate-survey/package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.071Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.071Z
Learning: In the elevate-project/constants/routes.js file, the `orchestrated` property is not compulsory for all route configurations. Many routes exist without this property, making it optional rather than required.

Applied to files:

  • elevate-survey/constants/routes.js
📚 Learning: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.071Z
Learnt from: MallanagoudaB
Repo: ELEVATE-Project/utils PR: 329
File: elevate-project/constants/routes.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T09:46:50.071Z
Learning: In the elevate-project/constants/routes.js file, the `orchestrated` property is not compulsory for all route configurations. Out of 293 total routes, 33 routes (about 11%) exist without this property, making it optional rather than required.

Applied to files:

  • elevate-survey/constants/routes.js
🔇 Additional comments (1)
elevate-survey/package.json (1)

3-3: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.

The patch version increment from 1.0.21 to 1.0.22 correctly reflects the addition of new API endpoints.

@priyanka-TL priyanka-TL merged commit a1d6f4a into master Dec 4, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants