Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With faa89ff#diff-aa80479ec21430b1df16920459f5125ea4b52bdc7c0f3c2e9bec2b9e13fe2e5dR478 we added a line to set / increment the number of parcels
n_parcelswhich is used for the optimised rejection method (whenxlo,xhi,yloandyhiare present. However, this breaks the inefficient rejection method which already sets / updateds the number of parcels (here: https://github.com/EPIC-model/epic/pull/570/files#diff-aa80479ec21430b1df16920459f5125ea4b52bdc7c0f3c2e9bec2b9e13fe2e5dL466).