Skip to content

Conversation

@cdecker
Copy link
Member

@cdecker cdecker commented Apr 16, 2025

We were overly specific in selecting python38. As that has now
reached its EOL, the package to install would be python39, however
there is a meta-pacakge python3 that I think we can keep using
without having to bump the package name on the next EOL event.

@cdecker cdecker force-pushed the 202504-fix-freebsd branch 3 times, most recently from d7441a3 to 27fe6f8 Compare April 16, 2025 09:26
We were overly specific in selecting `python38`. As that has now
reached its EOL, the package to install would be `python39`, however
there is a meta-pacakge `python3` that I think we can keep using
without having to bump the package name on the next EOL event.

Changelog-None
@cdecker cdecker force-pushed the 202504-fix-freebsd branch from 27fe6f8 to 9f1c57b Compare April 16, 2025 09:42
@cdecker cdecker force-pushed the 202504-fix-freebsd branch from 94055d1 to 6b35c57 Compare April 16, 2025 10:22
@ShahanaFarooqui
Copy link
Collaborator

Duplicate to #8229?

@cdecker
Copy link
Member Author

cdecker commented Apr 19, 2025

Sure

@cdecker cdecker closed this Apr 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants